Incidence, risk, and outcome of reintervention after aortocoronary bypass surgery. 1987

K Laird-Meeter, and R van Domburg, and M J van den Brand, and J Lubsen, and E Bos, and P G Hugenholtz

Reintervention was required in 123 (12%) individuals during a follow up (mean 7.5 years, range 5-14.5) of 1041 patients with consecutive, isolated, first aortocoronary bypass operations. In 89 patients the intervention was a repeat bypass operation, in 24 it was angioplasty, and 10 had both. Procedure related mortality was significantly higher at reintervention (5.6%) than at the primary operation (1.2%). Survival probability after a single bypass procedure was 90% at six years and 82(3)% at nine years. Corresponding figures six and nine years after reintervention were 89(6)% and 87(7)% respectively. Stepwise multivariate analysis showed that survival was significantly correlated with left ventricular function (rate ratio 1.82) and with extent of vascular disease (rate ratio 1.80) but not with reintervention (rate ratio 1.45). Symptomatic improvement occurred in 89% of the survivors with or without reintervention. Repeat procedures are often necessary after coronary artery bypass grafting but they appear to provide appreciable relief of symptoms without reducing any long term improvement in survival brought about by the original operation.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D009426 Netherlands Country located in EUROPE. It is bordered by the NORTH SEA, BELGIUM, and GERMANY. Constituent areas are Aruba, Curacao, and Sint Maarten, formerly included in the NETHERLANDS ANTILLES. Holland,Kingdom of the Netherlands
D011379 Prognosis A prediction of the probable outcome of a disease based on a individual's condition and the usual course of the disease as seen in similar situations. Prognostic Factor,Prognostic Factors,Factor, Prognostic,Factors, Prognostic,Prognoses
D011475 Prosthesis Failure Malfunction of implantation shunts, valves, etc., and prosthesis loosening, migration, and breaking. Prosthesis Loosening,Prosthesis Durability,Prosthesis Migration,Prosthesis Survival,Durabilities, Prosthesis,Durability, Prosthesis,Failure, Prosthesis,Failures, Prosthesis,Loosening, Prosthesis,Loosenings, Prosthesis,Migration, Prosthesis,Migrations, Prosthesis,Prosthesis Durabilities,Prosthesis Failures,Prosthesis Loosenings,Prosthesis Migrations,Prosthesis Survivals,Survival, Prosthesis,Survivals, Prosthesis
D012086 Reoperation A repeat operation for the same condition in the same patient due to disease progression or recurrence, or as followup to failed previous surgery. Revision, Joint,Revision, Surgical,Surgery, Repeat,Surgical Revision,Repeat Surgery,Revision Surgery,Joint Revision,Revision Surgeries,Surgery, Revision
D001807 Blood Vessel Prosthesis Device constructed of either synthetic or biological material that is used for the repair of injured or diseased blood vessels. Vascular Prosthesis,Blood Vessel Prostheses,Tissue-Engineered Vascular Graft,Graft, Tissue-Engineered Vascular,Grafts, Tissue-Engineered Vascular,Prostheses, Blood Vessel,Prostheses, Vascular,Prosthesis, Blood Vessel,Prosthesis, Vascular,Tissue Engineered Vascular Graft,Tissue-Engineered Vascular Grafts,Vascular Graft, Tissue-Engineered,Vascular Grafts, Tissue-Engineered,Vascular Prostheses,Vessel Prostheses, Blood,Vessel Prosthesis, Blood
D005260 Female Females
D005500 Follow-Up Studies Studies in which individuals or populations are followed to assess the outcome of exposures, procedures, or effects of a characteristic, e.g., occurrence of disease. Followup Studies,Follow Up Studies,Follow-Up Study,Followup Study,Studies, Follow-Up,Studies, Followup,Study, Follow-Up,Study, Followup
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man

Related Publications

K Laird-Meeter, and R van Domburg, and M J van den Brand, and J Lubsen, and E Bos, and P G Hugenholtz
January 1982, Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift,
K Laird-Meeter, and R van Domburg, and M J van den Brand, and J Lubsen, and E Bos, and P G Hugenholtz
May 1982, Canadian Medical Association journal,
K Laird-Meeter, and R van Domburg, and M J van den Brand, and J Lubsen, and E Bos, and P G Hugenholtz
July 1979, Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux,
K Laird-Meeter, and R van Domburg, and M J van den Brand, and J Lubsen, and E Bos, and P G Hugenholtz
April 1981, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine,
K Laird-Meeter, and R van Domburg, and M J van den Brand, and J Lubsen, and E Bos, and P G Hugenholtz
December 1984, Critical care medicine,
K Laird-Meeter, and R van Domburg, and M J van den Brand, and J Lubsen, and E Bos, and P G Hugenholtz
June 1983, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin,
K Laird-Meeter, and R van Domburg, and M J van den Brand, and J Lubsen, and E Bos, and P G Hugenholtz
June 1990, The Annals of thoracic surgery,
K Laird-Meeter, and R van Domburg, and M J van den Brand, and J Lubsen, and E Bos, and P G Hugenholtz
December 1978, Chest,
K Laird-Meeter, and R van Domburg, and M J van den Brand, and J Lubsen, and E Bos, and P G Hugenholtz
October 2013, Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals,
K Laird-Meeter, and R van Domburg, and M J van den Brand, and J Lubsen, and E Bos, and P G Hugenholtz
January 1999, International journal of clinical practice,
Copied contents to your clipboard!