HPV RNA in situ hybridization can inform cervical cytology-histology correlation. 2018

Joseph D Coppock, and Brian C Willis, and Mark H Stoler, and Anne M Mills
Department of Pathology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.

In situ hybridization for human papillomavirus (HPV) messenger RNA (HPV RNA ISH) recently was introduced as an ancillary tool in the diagnosis of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions, and can aid in the distinction between low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs) versus reactive/negative biopsies. Prior work has shown that up to one-half of cases originally diagnosed as LSIL are reclassified as negative/reactive by expert consensus review of morphology, and negative HPV RNA ISH results most often correlate with an expert diagnosis of negative/reactive. Given that LSIL overdiagnoses on biopsy may result in the erroneous clinical impression that a cervical lesion has been sampled appropriately, the authors proposed that HPV RNA ISH can inform cytology-histology correlation for challenging LSIL biopsies. A total of 92 cervical biopsies originally diagnosed as LSIL were reviewed by 3 gynecologic pathologists and reclassified based on consensus opinion of morphology. ISH was performed for high-risk and low-risk HPV E6/E7 mRNA. Prior/concurrent cytology results were collected. Based on expert consensus morphologic review, 49% of biopsies (45 of 92 biopsies) originally diagnosed as LSIL were reclassified as negative, 6.5% (6 of 92 biopsies) were reclassified as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and 44.5% (41 of 92 biopsies) were maintained as LSIL. The majority of LSIL biopsies reclassified as negative (80%; 36 of 45 biopsies) were HPV RNA negative, whereas 93% of LSIL biopsies (39 of 41 biopsies) and 100% of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion biopsies were HPV RNA positive. LSIL often is overdiagnosed by morphology on biopsy, potentially leading to the false impression that a lesion identified on cytology has been sampled. Performing RNA ISH on biopsies decreases histologic LSIL overdiagnosis, and potentially can prompt further sampling when there is cytology-histology discordance. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2018. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D011379 Prognosis A prediction of the probable outcome of a disease based on a individual's condition and the usual course of the disease as seen in similar situations. Prognostic Factor,Prognostic Factors,Factor, Prognostic,Factors, Prognostic,Prognoses
D002578 Uterine Cervical Dysplasia Abnormal development of immature squamous EPITHELIAL CELLS of the UTERINE CERVIX, a term used to describe premalignant cytological changes in the cervical EPITHELIUM. These atypical cells do not penetrate the epithelial BASEMENT MEMBRANE. Cervical Dysplasia,Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia,Cervix Dysplasia,Dysplasia of Cervix Uteri,Neoplasia, Cervical Intraepithelial,Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Grade III,Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasms,Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Cervical,Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine,Cervical Dysplasias,Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasm,Cervix Uteri Dysplasia,Cervix Uteri Dysplasias,Dysplasia, Cervical,Dysplasia, Cervix,Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical,Intraepithelial Neoplasm, Cervical,Intraepithelial Neoplasms, Cervical,Neoplasm, Cervical Intraepithelial,Neoplasms, Cervical Intraepithelial
D002583 Uterine Cervical Neoplasms Tumors or cancer of the UTERINE CERVIX. Cancer of Cervix,Cancer of the Cervix,Cancer of the Uterine Cervix,Cervical Cancer,Cervical Neoplasms,Cervix Cancer,Cervix Neoplasms,Neoplasms, Cervical,Neoplasms, Cervix,Uterine Cervical Cancer,Cancer, Cervical,Cancer, Cervix,Cancer, Uterine Cervical,Cervical Cancer, Uterine,Cervical Cancers,Cervical Neoplasm,Cervical Neoplasm, Uterine,Cervix Neoplasm,Neoplasm, Cervix,Neoplasm, Uterine Cervical,Uterine Cervical Cancers,Uterine Cervical Neoplasm
D003581 Cytodiagnosis Diagnosis of the type and, when feasible, the cause of a pathologic process by means of microscopic study of cells in an exudate or other form of body fluid. (Stedman, 26th ed) Cytodiagnoses
D005260 Female Females
D005500 Follow-Up Studies Studies in which individuals or populations are followed to assess the outcome of exposures, procedures, or effects of a characteristic, e.g., occurrence of disease. Followup Studies,Follow Up Studies,Follow-Up Study,Followup Study,Studies, Follow-Up,Studies, Followup,Study, Follow-Up,Study, Followup
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D012367 RNA, Viral Ribonucleic acid that makes up the genetic material of viruses. Viral RNA
D015331 Cohort Studies Studies in which subsets of a defined population are identified. These groups may or may not be exposed to factors hypothesized to influence the probability of the occurrence of a particular disease or other outcome. Cohorts are defined populations which, as a whole, are followed in an attempt to determine distinguishing subgroup characteristics. Birth Cohort Studies,Birth Cohort Study,Closed Cohort Studies,Cohort Analysis,Concurrent Studies,Historical Cohort Studies,Incidence Studies,Analysis, Cohort,Cohort Studies, Closed,Cohort Studies, Historical,Studies, Closed Cohort,Studies, Concurrent,Studies, Historical Cohort,Analyses, Cohort,Closed Cohort Study,Cohort Analyses,Cohort Studies, Birth,Cohort Study,Cohort Study, Birth,Cohort Study, Closed,Cohort Study, Historical,Concurrent Study,Historical Cohort Study,Incidence Study,Studies, Birth Cohort,Studies, Cohort,Studies, Incidence,Study, Birth Cohort,Study, Closed Cohort,Study, Cohort,Study, Concurrent,Study, Historical Cohort,Study, Incidence
D017403 In Situ Hybridization A technique that localizes specific nucleic acid sequences within intact chromosomes, eukaryotic cells, or bacterial cells through the use of specific nucleic acid-labeled probes. Hybridization in Situ,Hybridization, In Situ,Hybridizations, In Situ,In Situ Hybridizations

Related Publications

Joseph D Coppock, and Brian C Willis, and Mark H Stoler, and Anne M Mills
November 1995, Oncology reports,
Joseph D Coppock, and Brian C Willis, and Mark H Stoler, and Anne M Mills
January 2005, Kathmandu University medical journal (KUMJ),
Joseph D Coppock, and Brian C Willis, and Mark H Stoler, and Anne M Mills
November 2011, Der Pathologe,
Joseph D Coppock, and Brian C Willis, and Mark H Stoler, and Anne M Mills
January 1998, Acta cytologica,
Joseph D Coppock, and Brian C Willis, and Mark H Stoler, and Anne M Mills
July 1998, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics,
Joseph D Coppock, and Brian C Willis, and Mark H Stoler, and Anne M Mills
April 2016, The Malaysian journal of pathology,
Joseph D Coppock, and Brian C Willis, and Mark H Stoler, and Anne M Mills
January 2014, PloS one,
Joseph D Coppock, and Brian C Willis, and Mark H Stoler, and Anne M Mills
January 1998, Acta cytologica,
Joseph D Coppock, and Brian C Willis, and Mark H Stoler, and Anne M Mills
January 2023, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists,
Joseph D Coppock, and Brian C Willis, and Mark H Stoler, and Anne M Mills
January 1990, Archives of gynecology and obstetrics,
Copied contents to your clipboard!