Measurement, Prediction, and Control of Individual Heart Rate Responses to Exercise-Basics and Options for Wearable Devices. 2018

Melanie Ludwig, and Katrin Hoffmann, and Stefan Endler, and Alexander Asteroth, and Josef Wiemeyer
Department of Computer Sciences, Institute of Technology, Resource and Energy-Efficient Engineering, Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences, St. Augustin, Germany.

The use of wearable devices or "wearables" in the physical activity domain has been increasing in the last years. These devices are used as training tools providing the user with detailed information about individual physiological responses and feedback to the physical training process. Advantages in sensor technology, miniaturization, energy consumption and processing power increased the usability of these wearables. Furthermore, available sensor technologies must be reliable, valid, and usable. Considering the variety of the existing sensors not all of them are suitable to be integrated in wearables. The application and development of wearables has to consider the characteristics of the physical training process to improve the effectiveness and efficiency as training tools. During physical training, it is essential to elicit individual optimal strain to evoke the desired adjustments to training. One important goal is to neither overstrain nor under challenge the user. Many wearables use heart rate as indicator for this individual strain. However, due to a variety of internal and external influencing factors, heart rate kinetics are highly variable making it difficult to control the stress eliciting individually optimal strain. For optimal training control it is essential to model and predict individual responses and adapt the external stress if necessary. Basis for this modeling is the valid and reliable recording of these individual responses. Depending on the heart rate kinetics and the obtained physiological data, different models and techniques are available that can be used for strain or training control. Aim of this review is to give an overview of measurement, prediction, and control of individual heart rate responses. Therefore, available sensor technologies measuring the individual heart rate responses are analyzed and approaches to model and predict these individual responses discussed. Additionally, the feasibility for wearables is analyzed.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Melanie Ludwig, and Katrin Hoffmann, and Stefan Endler, and Alexander Asteroth, and Josef Wiemeyer
November 2023, iScience,
Melanie Ludwig, and Katrin Hoffmann, and Stefan Endler, and Alexander Asteroth, and Josef Wiemeyer
April 2020, Journal of medical engineering & technology,
Melanie Ludwig, and Katrin Hoffmann, and Stefan Endler, and Alexander Asteroth, and Josef Wiemeyer
August 2023, Annals of rehabilitation medicine,
Melanie Ludwig, and Katrin Hoffmann, and Stefan Endler, and Alexander Asteroth, and Josef Wiemeyer
October 2019, Data in brief,
Melanie Ludwig, and Katrin Hoffmann, and Stefan Endler, and Alexander Asteroth, and Josef Wiemeyer
March 2020, Sensors (Basel, Switzerland),
Melanie Ludwig, and Katrin Hoffmann, and Stefan Endler, and Alexander Asteroth, and Josef Wiemeyer
December 2009, European heart journal,
Melanie Ludwig, and Katrin Hoffmann, and Stefan Endler, and Alexander Asteroth, and Josef Wiemeyer
March 2016, Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie,
Melanie Ludwig, and Katrin Hoffmann, and Stefan Endler, and Alexander Asteroth, and Josef Wiemeyer
September 2021, NPJ digital medicine,
Melanie Ludwig, and Katrin Hoffmann, and Stefan Endler, and Alexander Asteroth, and Josef Wiemeyer
May 2019, Korean circulation journal,
Melanie Ludwig, and Katrin Hoffmann, and Stefan Endler, and Alexander Asteroth, and Josef Wiemeyer
January 1988, Journal of sports sciences,
Copied contents to your clipboard!