Fifty-four lung carcinomas submitted for routine electron microscopy under the light microscopical diagnosis of small cell carcinoma were investigated. In 42 or of 45 evaluable cases, neuroendocrine granules were considered definitely or probably present, the modification 'probably' being necessary in suboptimal material. In three cases, squamous cell differentiation was seen, but no neuroendocrine granules were found. On revision of these three cases, the light microscopical diagnosis was changed to squamous cell carcinoma in one instance, and neither of the other two cases was considered classical for small cell carcinoma. Patient follow-up of these three cases showed tumour behaviour indicative of non-small cell carcinoma in two evaluable cases, the third case yielding no significant data. These results indicate that neuroendocrine granules can generally be found in small cell lung carcinomas, provided the material is sufficient for evaluation. When these granules are absent, and other differentiation is found on electron microscopy, the final classification of the tumour should incorporate this finding, to warn the clinician that the tumour will not necessarily behave as a small cell carcinoma.