Are visual processes causally involved in "perceptual simulation" effects in the sentence-picture verification task? 2019

Markus Ostarek, and Dennis Joosen, and Adil Ishag, and Monique de Nijs, and Falk Huettig
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences, The Netherlands. Electronic address: markus.ostarek@mpi.nl.

Many studies have shown that sentences implying an object to have a certain shape produce a robust reaction time advantage for shape-matching pictures in the sentence-picture verification task. Typically, this finding has been interpreted as evidence for perceptual simulation, i.e., that access to implicit shape information involves the activation of modality-specific visual processes. It follows from this proposal that disrupting visual processing during sentence comprehension should interfere with perceptual simulation and obliterate the match effect. Here we directly test this hypothesis. Participants listened to sentences while seeing either visual noise that was previously shown to strongly interfere with basic visual processing or a blank screen. Experiments 1 and 2 replicated the match effect but crucially visual noise did not modulate it. When an interference technique was used that targeted high-level semantic processing (Experiment 3) however the match effect vanished. Visual noise specifically targeting high-level visual processes (Experiment 4) only had a minimal effect on the match effect. We conclude that the shape match effect in the sentence-picture verification paradigm is unlikely to rely on perceptual simulation.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D010364 Pattern Recognition, Visual Mental process to visually perceive a critical number of facts (the pattern), such as characters, shapes, displays, or designs. Recognition, Visual Pattern,Visual Pattern Recognition
D011578 Psycholinguistics A discipline concerned with relations between messages and the characteristics of individuals who select and interpret them; it deals directly with the processes of encoding (phonetics) and decoding (psychoacoustics) as they relate states of messages to states of communicators. Psycholinguistic
D011597 Psychomotor Performance The coordination of a sensory or ideational (cognitive) process and a motor activity. Perceptual Motor Performance,Sensory Motor Performance,Visual Motor Coordination,Coordination, Visual Motor,Coordinations, Visual Motor,Motor Coordination, Visual,Motor Coordinations, Visual,Motor Performance, Perceptual,Motor Performance, Sensory,Motor Performances, Perceptual,Motor Performances, Sensory,Perceptual Motor Performances,Performance, Perceptual Motor,Performance, Psychomotor,Performance, Sensory Motor,Performances, Perceptual Motor,Performances, Psychomotor,Performances, Sensory Motor,Psychomotor Performances,Sensory Motor Performances,Visual Motor Coordinations
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000328 Adult A person having attained full growth or maturity. Adults are of 19 through 44 years of age. For a person between 19 and 24 years of age, YOUNG ADULT is available. Adults
D013067 Speech Perception The process whereby an utterance is decoded into a representation in terms of linguistic units (sequences of phonetic segments which combine to form lexical and grammatical morphemes). Speech Discrimination,Discrimination, Speech,Perception, Speech
D032882 Comprehension The act or fact of grasping the meaning, nature, or importance of; understanding. (American Heritage Dictionary, 4th ed) Includes understanding by a patient or research subject of information disclosed orally or in writing. Readability,Understanding

Related Publications

Markus Ostarek, and Dennis Joosen, and Adil Ishag, and Monique de Nijs, and Falk Huettig
September 1996, Memory & cognition,
Markus Ostarek, and Dennis Joosen, and Adil Ishag, and Monique de Nijs, and Falk Huettig
May 2017, Experimental psychology,
Markus Ostarek, and Dennis Joosen, and Adil Ishag, and Monique de Nijs, and Falk Huettig
February 1984, Ergonomics,
Markus Ostarek, and Dennis Joosen, and Adil Ishag, and Monique de Nijs, and Falk Huettig
January 2007, Experimental psychology,
Markus Ostarek, and Dennis Joosen, and Adil Ishag, and Monique de Nijs, and Falk Huettig
February 2020, Journal of psycholinguistic research,
Markus Ostarek, and Dennis Joosen, and Adil Ishag, and Monique de Nijs, and Falk Huettig
September 1981, Canadian journal of psychology,
Markus Ostarek, and Dennis Joosen, and Adil Ishag, and Monique de Nijs, and Falk Huettig
April 2011, Psychophysiology,
Markus Ostarek, and Dennis Joosen, and Adil Ishag, and Monique de Nijs, and Falk Huettig
February 1996, Journal of abnormal psychology,
Markus Ostarek, and Dennis Joosen, and Adil Ishag, and Monique de Nijs, and Falk Huettig
May 1974, Memory & cognition,
Markus Ostarek, and Dennis Joosen, and Adil Ishag, and Monique de Nijs, and Falk Huettig
March 2004, Memory & cognition,
Copied contents to your clipboard!