Invited review: Microbiota of the bovine udder: Contributing factors and potential implications for udder health and mastitis susceptibility. 2018

Hooman Derakhshani, and Kelsey B Fehr, and Shadi Sepehri, and David Francoz, and Jeroen De Buck, and Herman W Barkema, and Jan C Plaizier, and Ehsan Khafipour
Department of Animal Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2 Canada.

Various body sites of vertebrates provide stable and nutrient-rich ecosystems for a diverse range of commensal, opportunistic, and pathogenic microorganisms to thrive. The collective genomes of these microbial symbionts (the microbiome) provide host animals with several advantages, including metabolism of indigestible carbohydrates, biosynthesis of vitamins, and modulation of innate and adaptive immune systems. In the context of the bovine udder, however, the relationship between cow and microbes has been traditionally viewed strictly from the perspective of host-pathogen interactions, with intramammary infections by mastitis pathogens triggering inflammatory responses (i.e., mastitis) that are often detrimental to mammary tissues and cow physiology. This traditional view has been challenged by recent metagenomic studies indicating that mammary secretions of clinically healthy quarters can harbor genomic markers of diverse bacterial groups, the vast majority of which have not been associated with mastitis. These observations have given rise to the concept of "commensal mammary microbiota," the ecological properties of which can have important implications for understanding the pathogenesis of mastitis and offer opportunities for development of novel prophylactic or therapeutic products (or both) as alternatives to antimicrobials. Studies conducted to date have suggested that an optimum diversity of mammary microbiota is associated with immune homeostasis, whereas the microbiota of mastitic quarters, or those with a history of mastitis, are considerably less diverse. Whether disruption of the diversity of udder microbiota (dysbiosis) has a role in determining mastitis susceptibility remains unknown. Moreover, little is known about contributions of various biotic and abiotic factors in shaping overall diversity of udder microbiota. This review summarizes current understanding of the microbiota within various niches of the udder and highlights the need to view the microbiota of the teat apex, teat canal, and mammary secretions as interconnected niches of a highly dynamic microbial ecosystem. In addition, host-associated factors, including physiological and anatomical parameters, as well as genetic traits that may affect the udder microbiota are briefly discussed. Finally, current understanding of the effect of antimicrobials on the composition of intramammary microbiota is discussed, highlighting the resilience of udder microbiota to exogenous perturbants.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008321 Mammary Glands, Animal MAMMARY GLANDS in the non-human MAMMALS. Mammae,Udder,Animal Mammary Glands,Animal Mammary Gland,Mammary Gland, Animal,Udders
D008414 Mastitis, Bovine INFLAMMATION of the UDDER in cows. Bovine Mastitides,Bovine Mastitis,Mastitides, Bovine
D002417 Cattle Domesticated bovine animals of the genus Bos, usually kept on a farm or ranch and used for the production of meat or dairy products or for heavy labor. Beef Cow,Bos grunniens,Bos indicus,Bos indicus Cattle,Bos taurus,Cow,Cow, Domestic,Dairy Cow,Holstein Cow,Indicine Cattle,Taurine Cattle,Taurus Cattle,Yak,Zebu,Beef Cows,Bos indicus Cattles,Cattle, Bos indicus,Cattle, Indicine,Cattle, Taurine,Cattle, Taurus,Cattles, Bos indicus,Cattles, Indicine,Cattles, Taurine,Cattles, Taurus,Cow, Beef,Cow, Dairy,Cow, Holstein,Cows,Dairy Cows,Domestic Cow,Domestic Cows,Indicine Cattles,Taurine Cattles,Taurus Cattles,Yaks,Zebus
D005260 Female Females
D000818 Animals Unicellular or multicellular, heterotrophic organisms, that have sensation and the power of voluntary movement. Under the older five kingdom paradigm, Animalia was one of the kingdoms. Under the modern three domain model, Animalia represents one of the many groups in the domain EUKARYOTA. Animal,Metazoa,Animalia
D001419 Bacteria One of the three domains of life (the others being Eukarya and ARCHAEA), also called Eubacteria. They are unicellular prokaryotic microorganisms which generally possess rigid cell walls, multiply by cell division, and exhibit three principal forms: round or coccal, rodlike or bacillary, and spiral or spirochetal. Bacteria can be classified by their response to OXYGEN: aerobic, anaerobic, or facultatively anaerobic; by the mode by which they obtain their energy: chemotrophy (via chemical reaction) or PHOTOTROPHY (via light reaction); for chemotrophs by their source of chemical energy: CHEMOLITHOTROPHY (from inorganic compounds) or chemoorganotrophy (from organic compounds); and by their source for CARBON; NITROGEN; etc.; HETEROTROPHY (from organic sources) or AUTOTROPHY (from CARBON DIOXIDE). They can also be classified by whether or not they stain (based on the structure of their CELL WALLS) with CRYSTAL VIOLET dye: gram-negative or gram-positive. Eubacteria
D064307 Microbiota The full collection of microbes (bacteria, fungi, virus, etc.) that naturally exist within a particular biological niche such as an organism, soil, a body of water, etc. Human Microbiome,Microbiome,Microbiome, Human,Microbial Community,Microbial Community Composition,Microbial Community Structure,Community Composition, Microbial,Community Structure, Microbial,Community, Microbial,Composition, Microbial Community,Human Microbiomes,Microbial Communities,Microbial Community Compositions,Microbial Community Structures,Microbiomes,Microbiotas

Related Publications

Hooman Derakhshani, and Kelsey B Fehr, and Shadi Sepehri, and David Francoz, and Jeroen De Buck, and Herman W Barkema, and Jan C Plaizier, and Ehsan Khafipour
April 2020, Animal microbiome,
Hooman Derakhshani, and Kelsey B Fehr, and Shadi Sepehri, and David Francoz, and Jeroen De Buck, and Herman W Barkema, and Jan C Plaizier, and Ehsan Khafipour
October 2022, Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland),
Hooman Derakhshani, and Kelsey B Fehr, and Shadi Sepehri, and David Francoz, and Jeroen De Buck, and Herman W Barkema, and Jan C Plaizier, and Ehsan Khafipour
December 1987, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association,
Hooman Derakhshani, and Kelsey B Fehr, and Shadi Sepehri, and David Francoz, and Jeroen De Buck, and Herman W Barkema, and Jan C Plaizier, and Ehsan Khafipour
August 1997, Journal of dairy science,
Hooman Derakhshani, and Kelsey B Fehr, and Shadi Sepehri, and David Francoz, and Jeroen De Buck, and Herman W Barkema, and Jan C Plaizier, and Ehsan Khafipour
June 2013, Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde,
Hooman Derakhshani, and Kelsey B Fehr, and Shadi Sepehri, and David Francoz, and Jeroen De Buck, and Herman W Barkema, and Jan C Plaizier, and Ehsan Khafipour
October 2009, Journal of dairy science,
Hooman Derakhshani, and Kelsey B Fehr, and Shadi Sepehri, and David Francoz, and Jeroen De Buck, and Herman W Barkema, and Jan C Plaizier, and Ehsan Khafipour
February 2013, Journal of dairy science,
Hooman Derakhshani, and Kelsey B Fehr, and Shadi Sepehri, and David Francoz, and Jeroen De Buck, and Herman W Barkema, and Jan C Plaizier, and Ehsan Khafipour
April 2022, Animal microbiome,
Hooman Derakhshani, and Kelsey B Fehr, and Shadi Sepehri, and David Francoz, and Jeroen De Buck, and Herman W Barkema, and Jan C Plaizier, and Ehsan Khafipour
February 2011, Journal of dairy science,
Hooman Derakhshani, and Kelsey B Fehr, and Shadi Sepehri, and David Francoz, and Jeroen De Buck, and Herman W Barkema, and Jan C Plaizier, and Ehsan Khafipour
August 2018, Journal of dairy science,
Copied contents to your clipboard!