Purpose: To review the Journal's coverage of chemical radiosensitizers. Methods: I have reviewed all the possibly-relevant papers that appeared in the Journal prior to 1970 and since 2010, plus the most highly-cited papers from the intervening years. I excluded papers that dealt only with oxygen as a sensitizer, that referred to sensitization of phototoxicity or hyperthermia, or that described interactions with antineoplastic agents unless they clearly distinguish between additive toxicity and radiosensitization. My definition of 'chemical' was very broad, so the coverage includes everything from classical hypoxic cell sensitizers to gold nanoparticles. Results: A literature search identifies ∼600 Journal articles as involving 'radiation sensitizing agents'; these articles are not common in Journals' first years but take off after 1970 with a peak in the late 1980s. Half of the highly-cited radiosensitizer papers were published between 1969 and 1974; the two most-cited radiosensitizer papers were 1969 and 1979 papers on hypoxic cell sensitizers. The third most-cited radiosensitizer paper would not come for two more decades, and it would use a physical rather than a chemical approach to radiosensitization. Conclusion: The development of an agent that would differentially sensitize tumors to irradiation remains a 'holy grail' of clinically-oriented radiobiology. Approaches to this goal have been a major feature of the Journal since its first decade, but we have yet to find such an agent. Perhaps we should be discouraged, but personally, I remain optimistic that we (or our students) will succeed.