Objective assessment of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Development and validation of a feasible rating scale for formative and summative feedback. 2019

Mona M Savran, and Elise Hoffmann, and Lars Konge, and Christian Ottosen, and Christian Rifbjerg Larsen
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark. Electronic address: monasavran@gmail.com.

OBJECTIVE The aims of the study were to develop and gather validity evidence for a feasible rating scale for formative and summative assessment of total laparoscopic hysterectomy in the operating theatre. METHODS The study was a prospective observer-blinded cohort study. The rating scale was developed according to the generic format of Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills. We applied the contemporary framework of validity to examine validity evidence of the content, response process, internal structure, relationship to other variables, and consequences. Two experienced gynecologists constructed a preliminary version of the rating scale, which was reviewed by a multicentre team of experienced gynecologists in a modified Delphi process. The surgeons (beginners and experienced surgeons) were video recorded during live performance of total laparoscopic hysterectomies. Two blinded raters evaluated the performances independently using the rating scale. Internal consistency reliability and interrater reliability were calculated as measures of internal structure. The performances of the two groups were compared and a pass/fail score was set to show the consequences of the rating scale. RESULTS The content of the rating scale was defined during three Delphi rounds and upon agreement comprised of 12 items. Sixteen participants including 8 beginners and 8 experienced surgeons performed total laparoscopic hysterectomies. The internal consistency reliability of the items was 0.95 (Cronbach's alpha), and the interrater reliabilities (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, absolute agreement) were 0.996 for one rater and 0.998 for two raters (P <  0.001 for all correlations). The beginners' mean performance score was 19.2 (SD 7.1) and the experienced surgeons' score was 36.4 (SD 3.9); the groups performed statistically significantly different (P <  0.001). The pass/fail score was 29.3 with no false positives and no false negatives. CONCLUSIONS With this study, a feasible rating scale for the objective assessment of total laparoscopic hysterectomy was developed with sound validity evidence. The rating scale is suitable for both formative and summative feedback in the commencement of surgical training in gynecology.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007044 Hysterectomy Excision of the uterus. Hysterectomies
D010535 Laparoscopy A procedure in which a laparoscope (LAPAROSCOPES) is inserted through a small incision near the navel to examine the abdominal and pelvic organs in the PERITONEAL CAVITY. If appropriate, biopsy or surgery can be performed during laparoscopy. Celioscopy,Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures,Peritoneoscopy,Surgical Procedures, Laparoscopic,Laparoscopic Assisted Surgery,Laparoscopic Surgery,Laparoscopic Surgical Procedure,Procedure, Laparoscopic Surgical,Procedures, Laparoscopic Surgical,Surgery, Laparoscopic,Surgical Procedure, Laparoscopic,Celioscopies,Laparoscopic Assisted Surgeries,Laparoscopic Surgeries,Laparoscopies,Peritoneoscopies,Surgeries, Laparoscopic,Surgeries, Laparoscopic Assisted,Surgery, Laparoscopic Assisted
D011446 Prospective Studies Observation of a population for a sufficient number of persons over a sufficient number of years to generate incidence or mortality rates subsequent to the selection of the study group. Prospective Study,Studies, Prospective,Study, Prospective
D002983 Clinical Competence The capability to perform acceptably those duties directly related to patient care. Clinical Skills,Competence, Clinical,Clinical Competency,Clinical Skill,Competency, Clinical,Skill, Clinical,Skills, Clinical,Clinical Competencies,Competencies, Clinical
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D015203 Reproducibility of Results The statistical reproducibility of measurements (often in a clinical context), including the testing of instrumentation or techniques to obtain reproducible results. The concept includes reproducibility of physiological measurements, which may be used to develop rules to assess probability or prognosis, or response to a stimulus; reproducibility of occurrence of a condition; and reproducibility of experimental results. Reliability and Validity,Reliability of Result,Reproducibility Of Result,Reproducibility of Finding,Validity of Result,Validity of Results,Face Validity,Reliability (Epidemiology),Reliability of Results,Reproducibility of Findings,Test-Retest Reliability,Validity (Epidemiology),Finding Reproducibilities,Finding Reproducibility,Of Result, Reproducibility,Of Results, Reproducibility,Reliabilities, Test-Retest,Reliability, Test-Retest,Result Reliabilities,Result Reliability,Result Validities,Result Validity,Result, Reproducibility Of,Results, Reproducibility Of,Test Retest Reliability,Validity and Reliability,Validity, Face
D017063 Outcome Assessment, Health Care Research aimed at assessing the quality and effectiveness of health care as measured by the attainment of a specified end result or outcome. Measures include parameters such as improved health, lowered morbidity or mortality, and improvement of abnormal states (such as elevated blood pressure). Assessment, Outcome,Outcome Assessment,Outcome Assessment (Health Care),Outcomes Research,Assessment, Outcomes,Outcome Measures,Outcome Studies,Outcomes Assessment,Assessment, Outcome (Health Care),Assessments, Outcome,Assessments, Outcome (Health Care),Assessments, Outcomes,Measure, Outcome,Measures, Outcome,Outcome Assessments,Outcome Assessments (Health Care),Outcome Measure,Outcome Study,Outcomes Assessments,Research, Outcomes,Studies, Outcome,Study, Outcome

Related Publications

Mona M Savran, and Elise Hoffmann, and Lars Konge, and Christian Ottosen, and Christian Rifbjerg Larsen
April 2007, American journal of pharmaceutical education,
Mona M Savran, and Elise Hoffmann, and Lars Konge, and Christian Ottosen, and Christian Rifbjerg Larsen
July 2022, ANZ journal of surgery,
Mona M Savran, and Elise Hoffmann, and Lars Konge, and Christian Ottosen, and Christian Rifbjerg Larsen
July 2022, ANZ journal of surgery,
Mona M Savran, and Elise Hoffmann, and Lars Konge, and Christian Ottosen, and Christian Rifbjerg Larsen
January 2016, Journal of surgical education,
Mona M Savran, and Elise Hoffmann, and Lars Konge, and Christian Ottosen, and Christian Rifbjerg Larsen
June 2013, American journal of audiology,
Mona M Savran, and Elise Hoffmann, and Lars Konge, and Christian Ottosen, and Christian Rifbjerg Larsen
October 2021, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology,
Mona M Savran, and Elise Hoffmann, and Lars Konge, and Christian Ottosen, and Christian Rifbjerg Larsen
December 2018, BMC medical education,
Mona M Savran, and Elise Hoffmann, and Lars Konge, and Christian Ottosen, and Christian Rifbjerg Larsen
June 2008, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology,
Mona M Savran, and Elise Hoffmann, and Lars Konge, and Christian Ottosen, and Christian Rifbjerg Larsen
February 2019, BMC medical education,
Mona M Savran, and Elise Hoffmann, and Lars Konge, and Christian Ottosen, and Christian Rifbjerg Larsen
January 2021, Cirugia y cirujanos,
Copied contents to your clipboard!