Are Antimony-Bismuth Aprons as Efficient as Lead Rubber Aprons in Providing Shielding against Scattered Radiation? 2018

Safora Johansen, and Ingrid Helen Ryste Hauge, and Peter Hogg, and Andrew England, and Luís Lança, and Catherine Gunn, and Audun Sanderud
Department of Life Sciences and Health, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway; Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital-Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: safora.johansen@hioa.no.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to compare the absorption ability of two lead-free aprons with a lead apron. METHODS The absorption ability of three aprons was measured and compared; Opaque Fusion 0.35 mm (OpaqFu) bilayer apron containing bismuth and antimony, No Lead 0.35 mm (NoLead) one-layer apron containing antimony, and a lead apron. The measurements were repeated with and without each of the aprons present in both primary and scattered beams. The selected tube voltages were between 60 and 113 kVp with constant mAs, a fixed field size, and fixed source-to-object distance. RESULTS No significant difference in absorption ability of the two lead-free aprons compared with that of the lead apron was observed when the dose was measured in the primary beam. When measurements were performed in the scatter radiation field, the absorption ability of the OpaqFu apron was 1.3 times higher than that of NoLead apron and nearly equal to the absorption ability of the lead apron. An increase in the difference between the OpaqFu and NoLead aprons was observed for the tube energies higher than 100 kVp in favour of OpaqFu apron. CONCLUSIONS It is safe to use the lead-free aprons that were tested in this study in a clinical environment for the tube energy range of 60 kVp-113 kVp.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Safora Johansen, and Ingrid Helen Ryste Hauge, and Peter Hogg, and Andrew England, and Luís Lança, and Catherine Gunn, and Audun Sanderud
November 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology,
Safora Johansen, and Ingrid Helen Ryste Hauge, and Peter Hogg, and Andrew England, and Luís Lança, and Catherine Gunn, and Audun Sanderud
November 2020, Radiography (London, England : 1995),
Safora Johansen, and Ingrid Helen Ryste Hauge, and Peter Hogg, and Andrew England, and Luís Lança, and Catherine Gunn, and Audun Sanderud
January 2012, Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey),
Safora Johansen, and Ingrid Helen Ryste Hauge, and Peter Hogg, and Andrew England, and Luís Lança, and Catherine Gunn, and Audun Sanderud
October 1986, The British journal of radiology,
Safora Johansen, and Ingrid Helen Ryste Hauge, and Peter Hogg, and Andrew England, and Luís Lança, and Catherine Gunn, and Audun Sanderud
July 2015, Radiation protection dosimetry,
Safora Johansen, and Ingrid Helen Ryste Hauge, and Peter Hogg, and Andrew England, and Luís Lança, and Catherine Gunn, and Audun Sanderud
May 2016, Heliyon,
Safora Johansen, and Ingrid Helen Ryste Hauge, and Peter Hogg, and Andrew England, and Luís Lança, and Catherine Gunn, and Audun Sanderud
May 2017, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR,
Safora Johansen, and Ingrid Helen Ryste Hauge, and Peter Hogg, and Andrew England, and Luís Lança, and Catherine Gunn, and Audun Sanderud
January 2023, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions,
Safora Johansen, and Ingrid Helen Ryste Hauge, and Peter Hogg, and Andrew England, and Luís Lança, and Catherine Gunn, and Audun Sanderud
January 2007, Radiation protection dosimetry,
Safora Johansen, and Ingrid Helen Ryste Hauge, and Peter Hogg, and Andrew England, and Luís Lança, and Catherine Gunn, and Audun Sanderud
January 2017, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine,
Copied contents to your clipboard!