The effect of restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategies on longer-term outcomes after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. 2020

Hessam H Kashani, and Carly Lodewyks, and Morvarid S Kavosh, and Maya M Jeyaraman, and Christine Neilson, and George Okoli, and Rasheda Rabbani, and Ahmed M Abou-Setta, and Ryan Zarychanski, and Hilary P Grocott
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, St. Boniface Hospital, University of Manitoba, CR3008-369 Tache Ave, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada.

OBJECTIVE Blood transfusions are frequently administered in cardiac surgery. Despite a large number of published studies comparing a "restrictive" strategy with a "liberal" strategy, no clear consensus has emerged to guide blood transfusion practice in cardiac surgery patients. The purpose of this study was to identify, critically appraise, and summarize the evidence on the overall effect of restrictive transfusion strategies compared with liberal transfusion strategies on mortality, other clinical outcomes, and transfusion-related outcomes in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS We searched MEDLINE (OvidSP), EMBASE (OvidSP) and Cochrane CENTRAL (Wiley) from inception to 1 December 2017 and queried clinical trial registries and conference proceedings for randomized-controlled trials of liberal vs restrictive transfusion strategies in cardiac surgery. RESULTS From 7,908 citations, we included ten trials (9,101 patients) and eight companion publications. Overall, we found no significant difference in mortality between restrictive and liberal transfusion strategies (risk ratio [RR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.54; I2 = 33%; seven trials; 8,661 patients). The use of a restrictive transfusion strategy did not appear to adversely impact any of the secondary clinical outcomes. As expected, the proportion of patients who received red blood cells (RBCs) in the restrictive group was significantly lower than in the liberal group (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.73; I2 = 56%; 5 trials; 8,534 patients). Among transfused patients, a restrictive transfusion strategy was associated with fewer transfused RBC units per patient than a liberal transfusion strategy. CONCLUSIONS In adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery, a restrictive transfusion strategy reduces RBC transfusion without impacting mortality rate or the incidence of other perioperative complications. Nevertheless, further large trials in subgroups of patients, potentially of differing age, are needed to establish firm evidence to guide transfusion in cardiac surgery. BACKGROUND PROSPERO (CRD42017071440); registered 20 April, 2018.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D001803 Blood Transfusion The introduction of whole blood or blood component directly into the blood stream. (Dorland, 27th ed) Blood Transfusions,Transfusion, Blood,Transfusions, Blood
D006348 Cardiac Surgical Procedures Surgery performed on the heart. Cardiac Surgical Procedure,Heart Surgical Procedure,Heart Surgical Procedures,Procedure, Cardiac Surgical,Procedure, Heart Surgical,Procedures, Cardiac Surgical,Procedures, Heart Surgical,Surgical Procedure, Cardiac,Surgical Procedure, Heart,Surgical Procedures, Cardiac,Surgical Procedures, Heart
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man

Related Publications

Hessam H Kashani, and Carly Lodewyks, and Morvarid S Kavosh, and Maya M Jeyaraman, and Christine Neilson, and George Okoli, and Rasheda Rabbani, and Ahmed M Abou-Setta, and Ryan Zarychanski, and Hilary P Grocott
March 2016, BMJ (Clinical research ed.),
Hessam H Kashani, and Carly Lodewyks, and Morvarid S Kavosh, and Maya M Jeyaraman, and Christine Neilson, and George Okoli, and Rasheda Rabbani, and Ahmed M Abou-Setta, and Ryan Zarychanski, and Hilary P Grocott
May 2017, Thrombosis and haemostasis,
Hessam H Kashani, and Carly Lodewyks, and Morvarid S Kavosh, and Maya M Jeyaraman, and Christine Neilson, and George Okoli, and Rasheda Rabbani, and Ahmed M Abou-Setta, and Ryan Zarychanski, and Hilary P Grocott
June 2017, Medicine,
Hessam H Kashani, and Carly Lodewyks, and Morvarid S Kavosh, and Maya M Jeyaraman, and Christine Neilson, and George Okoli, and Rasheda Rabbani, and Ahmed M Abou-Setta, and Ryan Zarychanski, and Hilary P Grocott
March 2015, BMJ (Clinical research ed.),
Hessam H Kashani, and Carly Lodewyks, and Morvarid S Kavosh, and Maya M Jeyaraman, and Christine Neilson, and George Okoli, and Rasheda Rabbani, and Ahmed M Abou-Setta, and Ryan Zarychanski, and Hilary P Grocott
April 2019, European heart journal,
Hessam H Kashani, and Carly Lodewyks, and Morvarid S Kavosh, and Maya M Jeyaraman, and Christine Neilson, and George Okoli, and Rasheda Rabbani, and Ahmed M Abou-Setta, and Ryan Zarychanski, and Hilary P Grocott
December 2018, The New England journal of medicine,
Hessam H Kashani, and Carly Lodewyks, and Morvarid S Kavosh, and Maya M Jeyaraman, and Christine Neilson, and George Okoli, and Rasheda Rabbani, and Ahmed M Abou-Setta, and Ryan Zarychanski, and Hilary P Grocott
December 2018, The New England journal of medicine,
Hessam H Kashani, and Carly Lodewyks, and Morvarid S Kavosh, and Maya M Jeyaraman, and Christine Neilson, and George Okoli, and Rasheda Rabbani, and Ahmed M Abou-Setta, and Ryan Zarychanski, and Hilary P Grocott
December 2018, The New England journal of medicine,
Hessam H Kashani, and Carly Lodewyks, and Morvarid S Kavosh, and Maya M Jeyaraman, and Christine Neilson, and George Okoli, and Rasheda Rabbani, and Ahmed M Abou-Setta, and Ryan Zarychanski, and Hilary P Grocott
February 2019, Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis,
Hessam H Kashani, and Carly Lodewyks, and Morvarid S Kavosh, and Maya M Jeyaraman, and Christine Neilson, and George Okoli, and Rasheda Rabbani, and Ahmed M Abou-Setta, and Ryan Zarychanski, and Hilary P Grocott
October 2017, The Lancet. Haematology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!