Germline Testing for Patients With BRCA1/2 Mutations on Somatic Tumor Testing. 2020

Katherine Vlessis, and Natasha Purington, and Nicolette Chun, and Sigurdis Haraldsdottir, and James M Ford
See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations.

BACKGROUND The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends germline testing for pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations identified by somatic tumor sequencing. The aim of this study was to explore whether patients at Stanford with somatic BRCA1/2 mutations were recommended germline testing in accordance with NCCN guidelines. METHODS We retrospectively collected all Stanford patients with BRCA1/2 mutations found by tumor sequencing. Medical records were reviewed for each patient to identify those recommended germline testing. A multivariable logistic regression model was fit associating baseline characteristics with whether or not a recommendation was made. RESULTS Of 164 participants, 51 (31.1%) had no recommendation for germline testing. Of the 97 available germline-testing results, 54 (55.7%) were positive for pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations. After adjusting for possible confounders, patients with genitourinary cancer (odds ratio [OR] = 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.00 to 0.03; P = .003), lung cancer (OR = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.21; P < .001), sarcoma (OR = 0.02, 95% CI = 0.00 to 0.14; P < .001), skin cancer (OR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.03; P = .002), or "other" diagnoses (OR = 0.01, 95% CI = 0.00 to 0.16; P < .001) were statistically significantly less likely to be recommended germline testing compared with patients with breast or gynecological cancers. CONCLUSIONS Our study highlights the importance of provider education outside of the oncologic specialties typically associated with BRCA-related cancers and continued exploration of referrals to genetics for germline testing on the basis of somatic findings.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Katherine Vlessis, and Natasha Purington, and Nicolette Chun, and Sigurdis Haraldsdottir, and James M Ford
October 2017, Gene therapy,
Katherine Vlessis, and Natasha Purington, and Nicolette Chun, and Sigurdis Haraldsdottir, and James M Ford
April 2016, Familial cancer,
Katherine Vlessis, and Natasha Purington, and Nicolette Chun, and Sigurdis Haraldsdottir, and James M Ford
October 2022, JCO precision oncology,
Katherine Vlessis, and Natasha Purington, and Nicolette Chun, and Sigurdis Haraldsdottir, and James M Ford
November 2017, JAMA,
Katherine Vlessis, and Natasha Purington, and Nicolette Chun, and Sigurdis Haraldsdottir, and James M Ford
June 2021, Journal of personalized medicine,
Katherine Vlessis, and Natasha Purington, and Nicolette Chun, and Sigurdis Haraldsdottir, and James M Ford
January 2020, Frontiers in oncology,
Katherine Vlessis, and Natasha Purington, and Nicolette Chun, and Sigurdis Haraldsdottir, and James M Ford
December 2016, Oncotarget,
Katherine Vlessis, and Natasha Purington, and Nicolette Chun, and Sigurdis Haraldsdottir, and James M Ford
November 2022, Cancer genetics,
Katherine Vlessis, and Natasha Purington, and Nicolette Chun, and Sigurdis Haraldsdottir, and James M Ford
October 2010, International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society,
Katherine Vlessis, and Natasha Purington, and Nicolette Chun, and Sigurdis Haraldsdottir, and James M Ford
March 2021, Annals of translational medicine,
Copied contents to your clipboard!