Radiation and hormonal therapy for primary treatment of stage I endometrial cancer and long-term survival. 2020

A Pyrzak, and L Chen, and M Kocherginsky, and E L Barber
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America. Electronic address: adam.pyrzak@northwestern.edu.

Estimate the association between non-surgical management (NSM) (e.g. hormonal or radiation therapy) and overall survival among women with stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) and identify patient and facility characteristics associated with receipt of NSM. Women >45 years of age with clinical stage I EEC were identified in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016. Women treated with NSM were compared with women treated initially with hysterectomy. Patient and facility characteristics associated with NSM were evaluated using logistic regression models. Association with overall survival was examined using log-rank tests, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards regression models with and without propensity score matching (PSM). A total of 112,469 women underwent treatment for stage I EEC between 2004 and 2016. 2776 (3%) received NSM, of whom 1987 (71%) received radiation therapy, 688 (25%) received hormonal therapy, and 101 (4%) received both. Older age, black race, higher Charlson-Deyo scores, Medicaid insurance, and low annual facility hysterectomy volume were associated with receiving NSM. The 5-year survival rate was 40% (95%CI: 37%-42%) for women with NSM compared to 89% (95%CI: 88%-89%) for hysterectomy. Women treated with NSM died at a faster rate than those who underwent primary hysterectomy (HR 7.6, 95%CI: 7.2-8.0; p < 0.001). This statistically significant difference in survival persisted in adjusted Cox proportional hazards models and after PSM. Women treated with NSM had a significantly higher risk of death compared to those undergoing hysterectomy for stage I EEC. Caution should be used when selecting patients for NSM given its worse outcomes.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D009367 Neoplasm Staging Methods which attempt to express in replicable terms the extent of the neoplasm in the patient. Cancer Staging,Staging, Neoplasm,Tumor Staging,TNM Classification,TNM Staging,TNM Staging System,Classification, TNM,Classifications, TNM,Staging System, TNM,Staging Systems, TNM,Staging, Cancer,Staging, TNM,Staging, Tumor,System, TNM Staging,Systems, TNM Staging,TNM Classifications,TNM Staging Systems
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000367 Age Factors Age as a constituent element or influence contributing to the production of a result. It may be applicable to the cause or the effect of a circumstance. It is used with human or animal concepts but should be differentiated from AGING, a physiological process, and TIME FACTORS which refers only to the passage of time. Age Reporting,Age Factor,Factor, Age,Factors, Age
D000368 Aged A person 65 years of age or older. For a person older than 79 years, AGED, 80 AND OVER is available. Elderly
D000369 Aged, 80 and over Persons 80 years of age and older. Oldest Old
D012189 Retrospective Studies Studies used to test etiologic hypotheses in which inferences about an exposure to putative causal factors are derived from data relating to characteristics of persons under study or to events or experiences in their past. The essential feature is that some of the persons under study have the disease or outcome of interest and their characteristics are compared with those of unaffected persons. Retrospective Study,Studies, Retrospective,Study, Retrospective
D014481 United States A country in NORTH AMERICA between CANADA and MEXICO.
D015331 Cohort Studies Studies in which subsets of a defined population are identified. These groups may or may not be exposed to factors hypothesized to influence the probability of the occurrence of a particular disease or other outcome. Cohorts are defined populations which, as a whole, are followed in an attempt to determine distinguishing subgroup characteristics. Birth Cohort Studies,Birth Cohort Study,Closed Cohort Studies,Cohort Analysis,Concurrent Studies,Historical Cohort Studies,Incidence Studies,Analysis, Cohort,Cohort Studies, Closed,Cohort Studies, Historical,Studies, Closed Cohort,Studies, Concurrent,Studies, Historical Cohort,Analyses, Cohort,Closed Cohort Study,Cohort Analyses,Cohort Studies, Birth,Cohort Study,Cohort Study, Birth,Cohort Study, Closed,Cohort Study, Historical,Concurrent Study,Historical Cohort Study,Incidence Study,Studies, Birth Cohort,Studies, Cohort,Studies, Incidence,Study, Birth Cohort,Study, Closed Cohort,Study, Cohort,Study, Concurrent,Study, Historical Cohort,Study, Incidence

Related Publications

A Pyrzak, and L Chen, and M Kocherginsky, and E L Barber
June 2008, Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.),
A Pyrzak, and L Chen, and M Kocherginsky, and E L Barber
August 1979, The Journal of urology,
A Pyrzak, and L Chen, and M Kocherginsky, and E L Barber
January 2003, Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England),
A Pyrzak, and L Chen, and M Kocherginsky, and E L Barber
November 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology,
A Pyrzak, and L Chen, and M Kocherginsky, and E L Barber
January 1988, Seminars in surgical oncology,
A Pyrzak, and L Chen, and M Kocherginsky, and E L Barber
August 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics,
A Pyrzak, and L Chen, and M Kocherginsky, and E L Barber
August 1969, Radiology,
A Pyrzak, and L Chen, and M Kocherginsky, and E L Barber
September 2004, Chest,
A Pyrzak, and L Chen, and M Kocherginsky, and E L Barber
February 1985, Gynecologic oncology,
A Pyrzak, and L Chen, and M Kocherginsky, and E L Barber
January 2012, Gynecologic oncology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!