-transparent.png){kind=logo}
On the implications of object permanence: Microhistorical insights from Piaget's new theory. 2020
Theory and History of Psychology Department, Heymans Institute for Psychological Research, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Science, University of Groningen, Groningen9718NG, Netherlands. J.T.Burman@RUG.NL https://www.rug.nl/staff/j.t.burman/.
The authors' arguments reflect the dominant traditions of American Psychology. In doing so, however, they miss relevant insights omitted during the original importation (translation and popularization) of the foreign sources that informed the theories they built upon. Of particular relevance here are Piaget's last studies. These are presented to unpack the meaning of "object permanence" as a kind of representation.
Related Publications
Jeremy Trevelyan Burman
March 1975,
Child development,
Jeremy Trevelyan Burman
December 1981,
Journal of learning disabilities,
Jeremy Trevelyan Burman
June 1971,
Child development,
Jeremy Trevelyan Burman
November 2008,
Journal of comparative psychology (Washington, D.C. : 1983),
Jeremy Trevelyan Burman
October 2001,
Trends in cognitive sciences,
Jeremy Trevelyan Burman
June 1972,
Child development,
Jeremy Trevelyan Burman
February 1970,
Journal of experimental child psychology,
Jeremy Trevelyan Burman
December 1981,
Perceptual and motor skills,
