Meta-analysis of redo stenting versus endarterectomy for in-stent stenosis after carotid artery stenting. 2021

Zeling Guo, and Chenshu Liu, and Kan Huang, and Nan Yu, and Meixiu Peng, and Benjamin W Starnes, and Warren B Chow, and Zilun Li, and Wayne W Zhang
Division of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

The development of in-stent restenosis (ISR) hinders the long-term patency of carotid artery stenting (CAS), yet no optimal treatment has been established. In the present study, we compared the outcomes of redo CAS (rCAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for ISR. A systematic search using the terms "in-stent restenosis," "carotid endarterectomy," and "carotid artery stenting" was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Studies reporting perioperative stroke, death, and other important complications of rCAS or CEA for ISR after previous CAS with four or more patients were included. Pooled and sensitivity analyses were conducted to synthesize and compare estimates of the outcomes. A total of 11 studies with 1057 patients who had undergone rCAS (n = 894) or CEA (n = 163) met the inclusion criteria. The CEA group had a significantly greater proportion of symptomatic patients (rCAS vs CEA, 30.4% vs 42.1%; P < .01). The duration from primary CAS to reintervention was relatively longer in the CEA group (rCAS vs CEA, median, 8.8 months [range, 3-26 months] vs 19.9 months [range, 0-54 months]). In the rCAS group, a greater proportion of patients had hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and coronary artery disease and had received antiplatelet therapy before reintervention. Because of insufficient data or a low incidence, the only complications feasible for further analysis were restenosis, myocardial infarction, cranial nerve injury, and neck hematoma. No significant differences were found in the primary end point of mortality/stroke event-free rate (rCAS vs CEA, 99% vs 98%; P > .05) or other secondary end points (event-free restenosis, 100% vs 100%; event-free myocardial infarction, 100% vs 98%; event-free cranial nerve injury, 100% vs 98%; event-free neck hematoma, 100% vs 100% for rCAS vs CEA; P > .05 for all). rCAS is commonly used to treat patients with severe and/or symptomatic ISR after primary CAS. Although the endovascular approach is less invasive, both rCAS and CEA can be performed safely with similar short- and midterm outcomes of stroke, death, and surgery-related complications.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D012008 Recurrence The return of a sign, symptom, or disease after a remission. Recrudescence,Relapse,Recrudescences,Recurrences,Relapses
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000368 Aged A person 65 years of age or older. For a person older than 79 years, AGED, 80 AND OVER is available. Elderly
D012307 Risk Factors An aspect of personal behavior or lifestyle, environmental exposure, inborn or inherited characteristic, which, based on epidemiological evidence, is known to be associated with a health-related condition considered important to prevent. Health Correlates,Risk Factor Scores,Risk Scores,Social Risk Factors,Population at Risk,Populations at Risk,Correlates, Health,Factor, Risk,Factor, Social Risk,Factors, Social Risk,Risk Factor,Risk Factor Score,Risk Factor, Social,Risk Factors, Social,Risk Score,Score, Risk,Score, Risk Factor,Social Risk Factor
D013997 Time Factors Elements of limited time intervals, contributing to particular results or situations. Time Series,Factor, Time,Time Factor
D014654 Vascular Patency The degree to which BLOOD VESSELS are not blocked or obstructed. Patency, Vascular,Patencies, Vascular,Vascular Patencies
D015607 Stents Devices that provide support for tubular structures that are being anastomosed or for body cavities during skin grafting. Stent

Related Publications

Zeling Guo, and Chenshu Liu, and Kan Huang, and Nan Yu, and Meixiu Peng, and Benjamin W Starnes, and Warren B Chow, and Zilun Li, and Wayne W Zhang
July 2010, Lancet (London, England),
Zeling Guo, and Chenshu Liu, and Kan Huang, and Nan Yu, and Meixiu Peng, and Benjamin W Starnes, and Warren B Chow, and Zilun Li, and Wayne W Zhang
July 2010, Lancet (London, England),
Zeling Guo, and Chenshu Liu, and Kan Huang, and Nan Yu, and Meixiu Peng, and Benjamin W Starnes, and Warren B Chow, and Zilun Li, and Wayne W Zhang
March 2007, American journal of surgery,
Zeling Guo, and Chenshu Liu, and Kan Huang, and Nan Yu, and Meixiu Peng, and Benjamin W Starnes, and Warren B Chow, and Zilun Li, and Wayne W Zhang
October 2010, The New England journal of medicine,
Zeling Guo, and Chenshu Liu, and Kan Huang, and Nan Yu, and Meixiu Peng, and Benjamin W Starnes, and Warren B Chow, and Zilun Li, and Wayne W Zhang
October 2010, The New England journal of medicine,
Zeling Guo, and Chenshu Liu, and Kan Huang, and Nan Yu, and Meixiu Peng, and Benjamin W Starnes, and Warren B Chow, and Zilun Li, and Wayne W Zhang
October 2010, The New England journal of medicine,
Zeling Guo, and Chenshu Liu, and Kan Huang, and Nan Yu, and Meixiu Peng, and Benjamin W Starnes, and Warren B Chow, and Zilun Li, and Wayne W Zhang
October 2010, The New England journal of medicine,
Zeling Guo, and Chenshu Liu, and Kan Huang, and Nan Yu, and Meixiu Peng, and Benjamin W Starnes, and Warren B Chow, and Zilun Li, and Wayne W Zhang
December 2023, Cureus,
Zeling Guo, and Chenshu Liu, and Kan Huang, and Nan Yu, and Meixiu Peng, and Benjamin W Starnes, and Warren B Chow, and Zilun Li, and Wayne W Zhang
November 2009, Journal of vascular surgery,
Zeling Guo, and Chenshu Liu, and Kan Huang, and Nan Yu, and Meixiu Peng, and Benjamin W Starnes, and Warren B Chow, and Zilun Li, and Wayne W Zhang
July 2018, World neurosurgery,
Copied contents to your clipboard!