Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast. 2021

Rashmi Sudhir, and Kamala Sannapareddy, and Alekya Potlapalli, and Pooja Boggaram Krishnamurthy, and Suryakala Buddha, and Veeraiah Koppula
Basavatarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Hyderabad, India.

OBJECTIVE To assess the diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) in breast cancer detection in comparison to synthetic two-dimensional mammography (s2D MG), digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) alone and DBT supplemented with ultrasound examination in females with dense breast with histopathology as the gold-standard. METHODS It was a prospective study, where consecutive females presenting to symptomatic breast clinic between April 2019 and June 2020 were evaluated with DBT. Females who were found to have heterogeneously dense (ACR type C) or extremely dense (ACR type D) breast composition detected on s2D MG were further evaluated with high-resolution breast ultrasound and thereafter with CEDM, but before the core biopsy or surgical excision, were included in the study. s2D MG was derived from post-processing reconstruction of DBT data set. Females with pregnancy, renal insufficiency or prior allergic reaction to iodinated contrast agent were excluded from the study. Image interpretation was done by two experienced breast radiologists and both were blinded to histological diagnosis. RESULTS This study included 166 breast lesions in130 patients with mean age of 45 ± 12 years (age range 24-72 years). There were 87 (52.4%) malignant and 79 (47.6%) benign lesions. The sensitivity of CEDM was 96.5%, significantly higher than synthetic 2D MG (75.6%, p < 0.0001), DBT alone (82.8%, p < 0.0001) and DBT + ultrasound (88.5%, p = 0.0057); specificity of CEDM was 81%, significantly higher than s2D MG (63.3%, p = 0.0002) and comparable to DBT alone (84.4%, p = 0.3586) and DBT + ultrasound (79.7%, p = 0.4135). In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve was of 0.896 for CEDM, 0.841 for DBT + ultrasound, 0.769 for DBT alone and 0.729 for s2D MG. CONCLUSIONS CEDM is an accurate diagnostic technique for cancer detection in dense breast. CEDM allowed a significantly higher number of breast cancer detection than the s2D MG, DBT alone and DBT supplemented with ultrasonography in females with dense breast. CONCLUSIONS CEDM is a promising novel technology with higher sensitivity and negative predictive value for breast cancer detection in females with dense breast in comparison to DBT alone or DBT supplemented with ultrasound.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008327 Mammography Radiographic examination of the breast. 3D-Mammography,Digital Breast Tomosynthesis,Digital Mammography,X-ray Breast Tomosynthesis,3D Mammography,3D-Mammographies,Breast Tomosyntheses, Digital,Breast Tomosyntheses, X-ray,Breast Tomosynthesis, Digital,Breast Tomosynthesis, X-ray,Digital Breast Tomosyntheses,Digital Mammographies,Mammographies,Mammographies, Digital,Mammography, Digital,X ray Breast Tomosynthesis,X-ray Breast Tomosyntheses
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D011446 Prospective Studies Observation of a population for a sufficient number of persons over a sufficient number of years to generate incidence or mortality rates subsequent to the selection of the study group. Prospective Study,Studies, Prospective,Study, Prospective
D011856 Radiographic Image Enhancement Improvement in the quality of an x-ray image by use of an intensifying screen, tube, or filter and by optimum exposure techniques. Digital processing methods are often employed. Digital Radiography,Image Enhancement, Radiographic,Radiography, Digital,Enhancement, Radiographic Image,Enhancements, Radiographic Image,Image Enhancements, Radiographic,Radiographic Image Enhancements
D001940 Breast In humans, one of the paired regions in the anterior portion of the THORAX. The breasts consist of the MAMMARY GLANDS, the SKIN, the MUSCLES, the ADIPOSE TISSUE, and the CONNECTIVE TISSUES. Breasts
D001943 Breast Neoplasms Tumors or cancer of the human BREAST. Breast Cancer,Breast Tumors,Cancer of Breast,Breast Carcinoma,Cancer of the Breast,Human Mammary Carcinoma,Malignant Neoplasm of Breast,Malignant Tumor of Breast,Mammary Cancer,Mammary Carcinoma, Human,Mammary Neoplasm, Human,Mammary Neoplasms, Human,Neoplasms, Breast,Tumors, Breast,Breast Carcinomas,Breast Malignant Neoplasm,Breast Malignant Neoplasms,Breast Malignant Tumor,Breast Malignant Tumors,Breast Neoplasm,Breast Tumor,Cancer, Breast,Cancer, Mammary,Cancers, Mammary,Carcinoma, Breast,Carcinoma, Human Mammary,Carcinomas, Breast,Carcinomas, Human Mammary,Human Mammary Carcinomas,Human Mammary Neoplasm,Human Mammary Neoplasms,Mammary Cancers,Mammary Carcinomas, Human,Neoplasm, Breast,Neoplasm, Human Mammary,Neoplasms, Human Mammary,Tumor, Breast
D003287 Contrast Media Substances used to allow enhanced visualization of tissues. Radiopaque Media,Contrast Agent,Contrast Agents,Contrast Material,Contrast Materials,Radiocontrast Agent,Radiocontrast Agents,Radiocontrast Media,Agent, Contrast,Agent, Radiocontrast,Agents, Contrast,Agents, Radiocontrast,Material, Contrast,Materials, Contrast,Media, Contrast,Media, Radiocontrast,Media, Radiopaque
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000071060 Breast Density Measurement of relative composition of different BREAST tissue types often determined from MAMMOGRAPHY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; or MRI. Mammographic Breast Density,Mammographic Density,Breast Densities,Breast Densities, Mammographic,Breast Density, Mammographic,Density, Mammographic,Mammographic Breast Densities,Mammographic Densities

Related Publications

Rashmi Sudhir, and Kamala Sannapareddy, and Alekya Potlapalli, and Pooja Boggaram Krishnamurthy, and Suryakala Buddha, and Veeraiah Koppula
November 2021, Radiography (London, England : 1995),
Rashmi Sudhir, and Kamala Sannapareddy, and Alekya Potlapalli, and Pooja Boggaram Krishnamurthy, and Suryakala Buddha, and Veeraiah Koppula
April 2023, Korean journal of radiology,
Rashmi Sudhir, and Kamala Sannapareddy, and Alekya Potlapalli, and Pooja Boggaram Krishnamurthy, and Suryakala Buddha, and Veeraiah Koppula
November 2012, The British journal of radiology,
Rashmi Sudhir, and Kamala Sannapareddy, and Alekya Potlapalli, and Pooja Boggaram Krishnamurthy, and Suryakala Buddha, and Veeraiah Koppula
January 2021, Clinical imaging,
Rashmi Sudhir, and Kamala Sannapareddy, and Alekya Potlapalli, and Pooja Boggaram Krishnamurthy, and Suryakala Buddha, and Veeraiah Koppula
July 2019, Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.),
Rashmi Sudhir, and Kamala Sannapareddy, and Alekya Potlapalli, and Pooja Boggaram Krishnamurthy, and Suryakala Buddha, and Veeraiah Koppula
June 2019, AJR. American journal of roentgenology,
Rashmi Sudhir, and Kamala Sannapareddy, and Alekya Potlapalli, and Pooja Boggaram Krishnamurthy, and Suryakala Buddha, and Veeraiah Koppula
December 2015, European journal of radiology,
Rashmi Sudhir, and Kamala Sannapareddy, and Alekya Potlapalli, and Pooja Boggaram Krishnamurthy, and Suryakala Buddha, and Veeraiah Koppula
January 2017, Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan),
Rashmi Sudhir, and Kamala Sannapareddy, and Alekya Potlapalli, and Pooja Boggaram Krishnamurthy, and Suryakala Buddha, and Veeraiah Koppula
May 2020, The breast journal,
Rashmi Sudhir, and Kamala Sannapareddy, and Alekya Potlapalli, and Pooja Boggaram Krishnamurthy, and Suryakala Buddha, and Veeraiah Koppula
January 2019, Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre,
Copied contents to your clipboard!