Important pharmacokinetic parameters for individualization of 177 Lu-PSMA therapy: A global sensitivity analysis for a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model. 2021

Deni Hardiansyah, and Peter Kletting, and Nusrat J Begum, and Matthias Eiber, and Ambros J Beer, and Supriyanto A Pawiro, and Gerhard Glatting
Medical Physics and Biophysics, Physics Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia.

OBJECTIVE The knowledge of the contribution of anatomical and physiological parameters to interindividual pharmacokinetic differences could potentially be used to improve individualized treatment planning for radionuclide therapy. The aim of this study was therefore to identify the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model parameters that determine the interindividual variability of absorbed doses (ADs) to kidneys and tumor lesions in therapy with 177 Lu-labeled PSMA-targeting radioligands. METHODS A global sensitivity analysis (GSA) with the extended Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (eFAST) algorithm was performed. The whole-body PBPK model for PSMA-targeting radioligand therapy from our previous studies was used in this study. The model parameters of interest (input of the GSA) were the organ receptor densities [R0 ], the organ blood flows f, and the organ release rates λ. These parameters were systematically sampled NE times according to their distribution in the patient population. The corresponding pharmacokinetics were simulated and the ADs (model output) to kidneys and tumor lesions were collected. The main effect and total effect were calculated using the eFAST algorithm based on the variability of the model output: The main effect of input parameter represents the reduction in variance of the output if the "true" value of parameter would be known. The total effect of an input parameter represents the proportion of variance remaining if the "true" values of all other input parameters except for are known. The numbers of samples NE were increased up to 8193 to check the stability (i.e., convergence) of the calculated main effects and total effects . RESULTS From the simulations, the relative interindividual variability of ADs in the kidneys (coefficient of variation CV = 31%) was lower than that of ADs in the tumors (CV up to 59%). Based on the GSA, the most important parameters that determine the ADs to the kidneys were kidneys flow (  = 0.36,  = 0.43) and kidneys receptor density (  = 0.25,  = 0.30). Tumor receptor density was identified as the most important parameter determining the ADs to tumors ( and up to 0.72). CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that an accurate measurement of receptor density and flow before therapy could be a promising approach for developing an individualized treatment with 177 Lu-labeled PSMA-targeting radioligands.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D019275 Radiopharmaceuticals Compounds that are used in medicine as sources of radiation for radiotherapy and for diagnostic purposes. They have numerous uses in research and industry. (Martindale, The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 30th ed, p1161) Radiopharmaceutical
D064129 Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant Tumors or cancer of the PROSTATE which can grow in the presence of low or residual amount of androgen hormones such as TESTOSTERONE. Androgen-Independent Prostatic Cancer,Androgen-Independent Prostatic Neoplasms,Androgen-Insensitive Prostatic Cancer,Androgen-Insensitive Prostatic Neoplasms,Androgen-Resistant Prostatic Cancer,Androgen-Resistant Prostatic Neoplasms,Castration-Resistant Prostatic Cancer,Castration-Resistant Prostatic Neoplasms,Hormone Refractory Prostatic Cancer,Hormone Refractory Prostatic Neoplasms,Prostatic Cancer, Androgen-Independent,Prostatic Cancer, Androgen-Insensitive,Prostatic Cancer, Androgen-Resistant,Prostatic Cancer, Castration-Resistant,Prostatic Cancer, Hormone Refractory,Prostatic Neoplasms, Androgen-Independent,Prostatic Neoplasms, Androgen-Insensitive,Prostatic Neoplasms, Androgen-Resistant,Prostatic Neoplasms, Hormone Refractory,Androgen Independent Prostatic Cancer,Androgen Independent Prostatic Neoplasms,Androgen Insensitive Prostatic Cancer,Androgen Insensitive Prostatic Neoplasms,Androgen Resistant Prostatic Cancer,Androgen Resistant Prostatic Neoplasms,Androgen-Independent Prostatic Cancers,Androgen-Independent Prostatic Neoplasm,Androgen-Insensitive Prostatic Cancers,Androgen-Insensitive Prostatic Neoplasm,Androgen-Resistant Prostatic Cancers,Androgen-Resistant Prostatic Neoplasm,Cancer, Androgen-Independent Prostatic,Cancer, Androgen-Insensitive Prostatic,Cancer, Androgen-Resistant Prostatic,Cancer, Castration-Resistant Prostatic,Cancers, Androgen-Independent Prostatic,Cancers, Androgen-Insensitive Prostatic,Cancers, Androgen-Resistant Prostatic,Cancers, Castration-Resistant Prostatic,Castration Resistant Prostatic Cancer,Castration Resistant Prostatic Neoplasms,Castration-Resistant Prostatic Cancers,Castration-Resistant Prostatic Neoplasm,Neoplasm, Androgen-Independent Prostatic,Neoplasm, Androgen-Insensitive Prostatic,Neoplasm, Androgen-Resistant Prostatic,Neoplasm, Castration-Resistant Prostatic,Neoplasms, Androgen-Independent Prostatic,Neoplasms, Androgen-Insensitive Prostatic,Neoplasms, Androgen-Resistant Prostatic,Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant Prostatic,Prostatic Cancer, Androgen Independent,Prostatic Cancer, Androgen Insensitive,Prostatic Cancer, Androgen Resistant,Prostatic Cancer, Castration Resistant,Prostatic Cancers, Androgen-Independent,Prostatic Cancers, Androgen-Insensitive,Prostatic Cancers, Androgen-Resistant,Prostatic Cancers, Castration-Resistant,Prostatic Neoplasm, Androgen-Independent,Prostatic Neoplasm, Androgen-Insensitive,Prostatic Neoplasm, Androgen-Resistant,Prostatic Neoplasm, Castration-Resistant,Prostatic Neoplasms, Androgen Independent,Prostatic Neoplasms, Androgen Insensitive,Prostatic Neoplasms, Androgen Resistant,Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration Resistant

Related Publications

Deni Hardiansyah, and Peter Kletting, and Nusrat J Begum, and Matthias Eiber, and Ambros J Beer, and Supriyanto A Pawiro, and Gerhard Glatting
December 2009, Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics,
Deni Hardiansyah, and Peter Kletting, and Nusrat J Begum, and Matthias Eiber, and Ambros J Beer, and Supriyanto A Pawiro, and Gerhard Glatting
April 2023, Nuclear medicine communications,
Deni Hardiansyah, and Peter Kletting, and Nusrat J Begum, and Matthias Eiber, and Ambros J Beer, and Supriyanto A Pawiro, and Gerhard Glatting
February 1991, Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics,
Deni Hardiansyah, and Peter Kletting, and Nusrat J Begum, and Matthias Eiber, and Ambros J Beer, and Supriyanto A Pawiro, and Gerhard Glatting
April 2023, Clinical nuclear medicine,
Deni Hardiansyah, and Peter Kletting, and Nusrat J Begum, and Matthias Eiber, and Ambros J Beer, and Supriyanto A Pawiro, and Gerhard Glatting
July 2021, Medical physics,
Deni Hardiansyah, and Peter Kletting, and Nusrat J Begum, and Matthias Eiber, and Ambros J Beer, and Supriyanto A Pawiro, and Gerhard Glatting
July 2016, Journal of labelled compounds & radiopharmaceuticals,
Deni Hardiansyah, and Peter Kletting, and Nusrat J Begum, and Matthias Eiber, and Ambros J Beer, and Supriyanto A Pawiro, and Gerhard Glatting
August 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis,
Deni Hardiansyah, and Peter Kletting, and Nusrat J Begum, and Matthias Eiber, and Ambros J Beer, and Supriyanto A Pawiro, and Gerhard Glatting
June 2024, Clinical nuclear medicine,
Deni Hardiansyah, and Peter Kletting, and Nusrat J Begum, and Matthias Eiber, and Ambros J Beer, and Supriyanto A Pawiro, and Gerhard Glatting
February 2019, Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics,
Deni Hardiansyah, and Peter Kletting, and Nusrat J Begum, and Matthias Eiber, and Ambros J Beer, and Supriyanto A Pawiro, and Gerhard Glatting
September 2019, Annals of nuclear medicine,
Copied contents to your clipboard!