Prognostic Value of Androgen Receptor Splice Variant 7 in the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2020

Jiaxin Wang, and Yucong Zhang, and Chao Wei, and Xintao Gao, and Penghui Yuan, and Jiahua Gan, and Rui Li, and Zhuo Liu, and Tao Wang, and Shaogang Wang, and Jihong Liu, and Xiaming Liu
Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

BACKGROUND The prognostic value of androgen receptor splice variant 7 (AR-V7) for the treatment response of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to synthesize relevant studies that assessed the prognostic value of AR-V7 status for the treatment response of mCRPC patients treated with androgen receptor signalling inhibitors (ARSis) and chemotherapy. METHODS We searched the PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases by using the keywords AR-V7 and prostate cancer to identify relevant studies published before 25 September 2019. The main outcomes were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects model. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. RESULTS A total of 1,545 patients from 21 studies were included. For the mCRPC patients treated with ARSis, AR-V7-positive patients had a lower PSA response rate (OR 6.01, 95% CI 2.88-12.51; P < 0.001), shorter PFS (HR 2.56, 95% CI 1.80-3.64; P < 0.001) and shorter OS (HR 4.28, 95% CI 2.92-6.27; P < 0.001) than AR-V7-negative patients. Although AR-V7-positive patients treated with chemotherapy also had a lower PSA response rate (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.38-3.62; P = 0.001) and shorter OS than AR-V7-negative patients (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.02-2.53; P = 0.043), there was no significant difference in PFS (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.74-1.49; P = 0.796) between these groups. Furthermore, AR-V7-positive patients receiving ARSis had a shorter median OS than those receiving chemotherapy (HR 3.50, 95% CI 1.98-6.20; P < 0.001); There was no significant difference among AR-V7-negative patients (HR 1.30, 95% CI 0.64-2.62; P = 0.47). CONCLUSIONS AR-V7 is a potential biomarker of treatment resistance in mCRPC patients. AR-V7-positive mCRPC patients had poorer treatment outcomes than AR-V7-nagetive patients when treated with ARSis. AR-V7-positive patients have better outcomes when treated with taxane than ARSis. Furthermore, the ability of AR-V7 status to predict treatment outcomes varies from different detection methods. The detection of AR-V7 before treatment is important for the selection of treatment modalities for mCRPC patients.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Jiaxin Wang, and Yucong Zhang, and Chao Wei, and Xintao Gao, and Penghui Yuan, and Jiahua Gan, and Rui Li, and Zhuo Liu, and Tao Wang, and Shaogang Wang, and Jihong Liu, and Xiaming Liu
July 2018, European urology focus,
Jiaxin Wang, and Yucong Zhang, and Chao Wei, and Xintao Gao, and Penghui Yuan, and Jiahua Gan, and Rui Li, and Zhuo Liu, and Tao Wang, and Shaogang Wang, and Jihong Liu, and Xiaming Liu
January 2020, Frontiers in oncology,
Jiaxin Wang, and Yucong Zhang, and Chao Wei, and Xintao Gao, and Penghui Yuan, and Jiahua Gan, and Rui Li, and Zhuo Liu, and Tao Wang, and Shaogang Wang, and Jihong Liu, and Xiaming Liu
August 2020, Andrologia,
Jiaxin Wang, and Yucong Zhang, and Chao Wei, and Xintao Gao, and Penghui Yuan, and Jiahua Gan, and Rui Li, and Zhuo Liu, and Tao Wang, and Shaogang Wang, and Jihong Liu, and Xiaming Liu
January 2020, Frontiers in oncology,
Jiaxin Wang, and Yucong Zhang, and Chao Wei, and Xintao Gao, and Penghui Yuan, and Jiahua Gan, and Rui Li, and Zhuo Liu, and Tao Wang, and Shaogang Wang, and Jihong Liu, and Xiaming Liu
August 2016, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association,
Jiaxin Wang, and Yucong Zhang, and Chao Wei, and Xintao Gao, and Penghui Yuan, and Jiahua Gan, and Rui Li, and Zhuo Liu, and Tao Wang, and Shaogang Wang, and Jihong Liu, and Xiaming Liu
January 2021, Technology in cancer research & treatment,
Jiaxin Wang, and Yucong Zhang, and Chao Wei, and Xintao Gao, and Penghui Yuan, and Jiahua Gan, and Rui Li, and Zhuo Liu, and Tao Wang, and Shaogang Wang, and Jihong Liu, and Xiaming Liu
December 2019, Annals of translational medicine,
Jiaxin Wang, and Yucong Zhang, and Chao Wei, and Xintao Gao, and Penghui Yuan, and Jiahua Gan, and Rui Li, and Zhuo Liu, and Tao Wang, and Shaogang Wang, and Jihong Liu, and Xiaming Liu
August 2015, JAMA oncology,
Jiaxin Wang, and Yucong Zhang, and Chao Wei, and Xintao Gao, and Penghui Yuan, and Jiahua Gan, and Rui Li, and Zhuo Liu, and Tao Wang, and Shaogang Wang, and Jihong Liu, and Xiaming Liu
November 2019, European urology,
Jiaxin Wang, and Yucong Zhang, and Chao Wei, and Xintao Gao, and Penghui Yuan, and Jiahua Gan, and Rui Li, and Zhuo Liu, and Tao Wang, and Shaogang Wang, and Jihong Liu, and Xiaming Liu
August 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!