EFFECT OF BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION TRAINING ON MUSCULAR PERFORMANCE, PAIN AND VASCULAR FUNCTION. 2020

Kate S Early, and Mallory Rockhill, and Alicia Bryan, and Brian Tyo, and David Buuck, and Josh McGinty
Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, Columbus State University, Columbus, GA, USA.

BACKGROUND Blood flow restriction (BFR) training enhances muscular strength and hypertrophy in several populations including older adults and injured athletes. However, the efficacy of emerging BFR technologies on muscular adaptations, vascular health, and pain is unclear. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to examine muscular performance, pain and vascular function in response to eight weeks of BFR compared to traditional resistance training and a control group. METHODS Randomized control trial. METHODS Thirty-one overtly healthy participants (age: 23 ± 4y, 65% female) underwent eight weeks of supervised high load resistance training (RES), low load resistance training with BFR (BFR) or no training (control, CON). RES and BFR (with pneumatic bands) performed seven upper and lower body exercises, two to three sessions per week at 60% and 30% of one-repetition maximum (1RM), respectively. Twenty-four hours post-exercise, general muscle soreness was assessed via a visual analog scale (VAS) and present pain intensity (PPI) of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. At baseline and after eight weeks, participants underwent one-repetition maximum (1RM), and flow-mediated dilation (FMD) testing. RESULTS At baseline all groups exhibited similar muscle strength and endurance and vascular function. At the end of training, RES and BFR groups significantly increased muscle strength (1RM) to a similar magnitude as compared to the CON group (p < 0.0001), but did not alter body composition. FMD significantly increased in RES and BFR groups compared to CON group (p = 0.006). VAS and PPI were similar between RES and BFR groups throughout the exercise sessions until VAS decreased in the BFR group after the last session compared to the RES group (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Compared to RES, BFR resulted in similar muscular performance (strength and endurance) and vascular improvements at a lower exercise intensity, suggesting BFR is an effective alternative to high load resistance training. Further longitudinal studies may gain greater understanding regarding general muscle pain and soreness when using BFR. METHODS Therapy, Level 2.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Kate S Early, and Mallory Rockhill, and Alicia Bryan, and Brian Tyo, and David Buuck, and Josh McGinty
June 2021, International journal of sports medicine,
Kate S Early, and Mallory Rockhill, and Alicia Bryan, and Brian Tyo, and David Buuck, and Josh McGinty
December 2018, Biology of sport,
Kate S Early, and Mallory Rockhill, and Alicia Bryan, and Brian Tyo, and David Buuck, and Josh McGinty
January 2019, Frontiers in physiology,
Kate S Early, and Mallory Rockhill, and Alicia Bryan, and Brian Tyo, and David Buuck, and Josh McGinty
June 2023, Journal of strength and conditioning research,
Kate S Early, and Mallory Rockhill, and Alicia Bryan, and Brian Tyo, and David Buuck, and Josh McGinty
March 2020, Der Unfallchirurg,
Kate S Early, and Mallory Rockhill, and Alicia Bryan, and Brian Tyo, and David Buuck, and Josh McGinty
September 2021, Journal of athletic training,
Kate S Early, and Mallory Rockhill, and Alicia Bryan, and Brian Tyo, and David Buuck, and Josh McGinty
December 2020, International journal of sports physical therapy,
Kate S Early, and Mallory Rockhill, and Alicia Bryan, and Brian Tyo, and David Buuck, and Josh McGinty
August 2023, BMC musculoskeletal disorders,
Kate S Early, and Mallory Rockhill, and Alicia Bryan, and Brian Tyo, and David Buuck, and Josh McGinty
June 2022, Scientific reports,
Kate S Early, and Mallory Rockhill, and Alicia Bryan, and Brian Tyo, and David Buuck, and Josh McGinty
May 2022, JOSPT cases,
Copied contents to your clipboard!