-transparent.png){kind=logo}
Five educators concerned with changes occurring in the financing of medical education and care reviewed the present status of residency programs and their financing. Future support depends on political decisions as well as demonstrable needs. The effects of anticipated reductions in funding for residents and their programs may be countered by the development of alternative sources and the restructuring of present programs for more efficient operation. The need for leadership is clear.
Related Publications
F Hinman, and
W H Boyce, and
M D Kerstein, and
E D Vaughan, and
P C Peters
December 2014,
Journal of graduate medical education,
F Hinman, and
W H Boyce, and
M D Kerstein, and
E D Vaughan, and
P C Peters
April 1977,
Urology,
F Hinman, and
W H Boyce, and
M D Kerstein, and
E D Vaughan, and
P C Peters
October 2021,
The Journal of urology,
F Hinman, and
W H Boyce, and
M D Kerstein, and
E D Vaughan, and
P C Peters
December 2007,
The Journal of urology,
F Hinman, and
W H Boyce, and
M D Kerstein, and
E D Vaughan, and
P C Peters
January 2018,
Urology practice,
F Hinman, and
W H Boyce, and
M D Kerstein, and
E D Vaughan, and
P C Peters
May 2002,
Journal of endourology,
F Hinman, and
W H Boyce, and
M D Kerstein, and
E D Vaughan, and
P C Peters
November 2011,
Journal of endourology,
F Hinman, and
W H Boyce, and
M D Kerstein, and
E D Vaughan, and
P C Peters
July 2020,
Urology,
F Hinman, and
W H Boyce, and
M D Kerstein, and
E D Vaughan, and
P C Peters
May 2019,
Current urology,
F Hinman, and
W H Boyce, and
M D Kerstein, and
E D Vaughan, and
P C Peters
May 2019,
Urology,
