Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Cesarean Delivery: A Survey of Anesthesiologists. 2020

Emily S Reiff, and Ashraf S Habib, and Brendan Carvalho, and Karthik Raghunathan
Durham, NC, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University, USA.

BACKGROUND The most common complication after cesarean delivery is surgical site infection. Antibiotic prophylaxis reduces infectious morbidity and current anesthetic quality metrics include preincision antibiotic prophylaxis. Recently, studies suggest reductions in infectious morbidity with the addition of azithromycin for unscheduled cesarean delivery. Larger doses of cefazolin are recommended for morbidly obese women, but evidence is conflicting. The aim of this study was to survey anesthesiologists to assess current practice for antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery. METHODS We invited a random sample of 10,000 current members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists to complete an online survey about their current practice of antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery in November 2017. The survey included questions similar to a previous survey on this topic in 2012. RESULTS The response rate was 12.2% (n = 1223). Most respondents had at least 15 years of experience (684, 55.9%), work at a nonteaching or community hospital (729, 59.6%), with >500 cesarean deliveries annually (619, 50.6%), and administer obstetric anesthesia several times a week (690, 56.4%). Routine preincision antibiotic prophylaxis was reported by 1162 (95.0%) of the 1223 respondents, a substantial improvement versus the 63.5% reported in the previous study in 2012. For intrapartum cesarean deliveries, 141 (11.5%) administer azithromycin for unscheduled cesarean deliveries. Those who use cefazolin, 509 (42.5%) administer 3 g for morbidly obese women. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to preincision antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery is very high, a significant improvement within 5 years. A minority of anesthesiologists utilize azithromycin for intrapartum cesarean deliveries. The dose of cefazolin for morbidly obese women varies widely.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Emily S Reiff, and Ashraf S Habib, and Brendan Carvalho, and Karthik Raghunathan
March 2013, Anesthesia and analgesia,
Emily S Reiff, and Ashraf S Habib, and Brendan Carvalho, and Karthik Raghunathan
January 2000, The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine,
Emily S Reiff, and Ashraf S Habib, and Brendan Carvalho, and Karthik Raghunathan
October 2009, Obstetrics and gynecology,
Emily S Reiff, and Ashraf S Habib, and Brendan Carvalho, and Karthik Raghunathan
March 2019, Southern medical journal,
Emily S Reiff, and Ashraf S Habib, and Brendan Carvalho, and Karthik Raghunathan
August 2012, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians,
Emily S Reiff, and Ashraf S Habib, and Brendan Carvalho, and Karthik Raghunathan
June 1998, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics,
Emily S Reiff, and Ashraf S Habib, and Brendan Carvalho, and Karthik Raghunathan
September 2016, The New England journal of medicine,
Emily S Reiff, and Ashraf S Habib, and Brendan Carvalho, and Karthik Raghunathan
January 2011, International journal of obstetric anesthesia,
Emily S Reiff, and Ashraf S Habib, and Brendan Carvalho, and Karthik Raghunathan
October 2010, The Medical letter on drugs and therapeutics,
Emily S Reiff, and Ashraf S Habib, and Brendan Carvalho, and Karthik Raghunathan
March 2009, Obstetrics and gynecology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!