The usefulness of lactate dehydrogenase (LD) and LD isoenzymes in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is controversial. The present study reviewed 507 consecutive patients in whom creatine kinase, creatine kinase isoenzymes, LD and LD isoenzymes were ordered over a 1-month period. Of these, 249 had an insufficient number of serial enzyme determinations to establish a laboratory diagnosis of AMI. After excluding an additional 11 patients for other reasons, 247 patients remained for analysis. Of these, only 2 (0.8%) had myocardial infarction by standard clinical criteria with normal creatine kinase and creatine kinase-MB but elevated LD and abnormal LD isoenzymes. Seven patients (7 of 247, 2.8%) had false-positive LD isoenzymes. Thus, the routine use of LD and LD isoenzymes was of no use in most patients (96%) and led to the incorrect diagnosis of AMI more than 3 times as often as it helped with a correct diagnosis. Total 1-month charges for all the LD and LD isoenzymes obtained equalled +42,450. Therefore, it appears that LD and LD isoenzymes are not routinely useful in the diagnosis of AMI and may result in considerable unnecessary expense. It is suggested that LD and LD isoenzymes be ordered only under suspicion of late presentation (greater than 48 hours) of AMI.