[Minimally invasive fixation of distal fibular fractures with intramedullary nailing]. 2021
OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive osteosynthesis of distal fibula fractures serves as a biomechanically stable and soft-tissue-friendly fixation method in the case of an unstable fracture, poor bone quality, and/or critical soft tissue conditions with restoration of the length, axis and rotation of the distal fibula as well as stabilization of the ankle mortise. The goal is to reduce and stabilize the distal fibular fracture in a quick and stable manner that protects the soft tissues in ankle fractures. METHODS Unstable malleolar fractures and fracture dislocations; fibular fractures in combination with distal tibia fractures; critical soft tissue conditions around the ankle. METHODS No consent to surgery by the patient. Overall critical (life-threatening) general condition preventing surgery to the extremities. Very narrow medullary canal of the fibula (less than 3 mm, depending on the implant). METHODS Percutaneous placement of a guidewire into the distal fibular tip, opening the medullary canal and drilling the medullary canal in the distal fragment. Reduction of the axis by introduction of the fibular nail, with additional percutaneous use of reduction clamps for restoration of fibular length and rotation, if necessary. Placement of distal locking screws over the targeting device while maintaining rotation and length, in addition proximal static locking is mandatory to maintain the length of the fibula. In case of residual syndesmotic instability after fracture fixation, syndesmotic screws are inserted through the fibular nail via the aiming device. METHODS Following surgery, rest and elevation of the injured leg, and local cooling are indicated. Subsequently, mobilization with partial weight bearing (15-20 kg) in an ankle foot orthosis or plaster/cast for 6 weeks. RESULTS Minimally invasive fibular fixation with an intramedullary nail results in a significantly lower rate of wound healing complications compared with lateral plating. Reported union rates range from 97.4 to 100% with current nail designs. The quality of reduction and functional outcome is comparable to that after plate fixation. A certain learning curve has to be respected.