Scaling up private land conservation to meet recovery goals for grassland birds. 2021

David C Pavlacky, and Christian A Hagen, and Anne M Bartuszevige, and Rich Iovanna, and Thomas Luke George, and David E Naugle
Bird Conservancy of the Rockies, Brighton, Colorado, USA.

Long-term population declines have elevated recovery of grassland avifauna to among the highest conservation priorities in North America. Because most of the Great Plains is privately owned, recovery of grassland bird populations depends on voluntary conservation with strong partnerships between private landowners and resource professionals. Despite large areas enrolled in voluntary practices through U.S. Department of Agriculture's Lesser Prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) Initiative (LPCI), the effectiveness of Farm Bill investments for meeting wildlife conservation goals remains an open question. Our objectives were to evaluate extents to which Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) and LPCI-grazing practices influence population densities of grassland birds; estimate relative contributions of practices to regional bird populations; and evaluate percentages of populations conserved relative to vulnerability of species. We designed a large-scale impact-reference study and used the Integrated Monitoring in Bird Conservation Regions program to evaluate bird population targets of the Playa Lakes Joint Venture. We used point transect distance sampling to estimate density and population size for 35 species of grassland birds on private lands enrolled in native or introduced CRP plantings and LPCI-prescribed grazing. Treatment effects indicated CRP plantings increased densities of three grassland obligates vulnerable to habitat loss, and LPCI grazing increased densities of four species requiring heterogeneity in dense, tall-grass structure (α = 0.1). Population estimates in 2016 indicated the practices conserved breeding habitat for 4.5 million birds (90% CI: 4.0-5.1), and increased population sizes of 16 species , totaling 1.8 million birds (CI: 1.4-2.4). Conservation practices on private land benefited the most vulnerable grassland obligate species (AICc weight = 0.53). By addressing habitat loss and degradation in agricultural landscapes, conservation on private land provides a solution to declining avifauna of North America and scales up to meet population recovery goals for the most imperiled grassland birds.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D003247 Conservation of Natural Resources The protection, preservation, restoration, and rational use of all resources in the total environment. Carrying Capacity,Deforestation,Desertification,Environmental Protection,Natural Resources Conservation,Protection, Environmental,Capacities, Carrying,Capacity, Carrying,Carrying Capacities,Conservation, Natural Resources
D006040 Goals The end-result or objective, which may be specified or required in advance. Goal
D000069600 Plant Breeding The purposeful manipulation of plant species with the goal of creating desired genotypes and phenotypes, using techniques such as controlled pollination and or genetic engineering, followed by artificial selection of progeny. Breeding, Plant
D000818 Animals Unicellular or multicellular, heterotrophic organisms, that have sensation and the power of voluntary movement. Under the older five kingdom paradigm, Animalia was one of the kingdoms. Under the modern three domain model, Animalia represents one of the many groups in the domain EUKARYOTA. Animal,Metazoa,Animalia
D001717 Birds Warm-blooded VERTEBRATES possessing FEATHERS and belonging to the class Aves. Aves,Bird
D065948 Grassland An ecosystem dominated by grasses (POACEAE) with few trees or shrubs. Meadows,Prairie,Savanna,Steppe,Grasslands,Meadow,Prairies,Savannas,Steppes

Related Publications

David C Pavlacky, and Christian A Hagen, and Anne M Bartuszevige, and Rich Iovanna, and Thomas Luke George, and David E Naugle
August 2019, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology,
David C Pavlacky, and Christian A Hagen, and Anne M Bartuszevige, and Rich Iovanna, and Thomas Luke George, and David E Naugle
June 2007, Ambio,
David C Pavlacky, and Christian A Hagen, and Anne M Bartuszevige, and Rich Iovanna, and Thomas Luke George, and David E Naugle
April 2019, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology,
David C Pavlacky, and Christian A Hagen, and Anne M Bartuszevige, and Rich Iovanna, and Thomas Luke George, and David E Naugle
June 2021, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology,
David C Pavlacky, and Christian A Hagen, and Anne M Bartuszevige, and Rich Iovanna, and Thomas Luke George, and David E Naugle
October 2009, Nature,
David C Pavlacky, and Christian A Hagen, and Anne M Bartuszevige, and Rich Iovanna, and Thomas Luke George, and David E Naugle
February 2012, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology,
David C Pavlacky, and Christian A Hagen, and Anne M Bartuszevige, and Rich Iovanna, and Thomas Luke George, and David E Naugle
November 2023, Journal of environmental management,
David C Pavlacky, and Christian A Hagen, and Anne M Bartuszevige, and Rich Iovanna, and Thomas Luke George, and David E Naugle
April 2022, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America,
David C Pavlacky, and Christian A Hagen, and Anne M Bartuszevige, and Rich Iovanna, and Thomas Luke George, and David E Naugle
September 2019, Environmental management,
David C Pavlacky, and Christian A Hagen, and Anne M Bartuszevige, and Rich Iovanna, and Thomas Luke George, and David E Naugle
April 2021, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI,
Copied contents to your clipboard!