The effects of hemispatial and asymmetrically focused attention on dichotic listening with normal and learning-disabled children. 1988

C A Boliek, and J E Obrzut, and D Shaw
Southern Illinois University, Colorado.

The effects of hemispatial and focused attention were examined with 50 normal and learning-disabled children to determine the extent of these two attentional strategies influenced perceptual laterality as reflected by the dichotic listening right-ear advantage (REA). Twenty-five normal children (8 females, 17 males, mean age 9.10 yr) matched with 25 learning-disabled children (8 females, 17 males, mean age 10.1 yr) were administered a dichotic consonant-vowel (CV) and consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) syllable task. The two types of stimuli were compared across focused attention (free report, focused left, focused right) and hemispatial (central, left hemispace, right hemispace) conditions implemented independently and in systematic combinations. A four-factorial analysis of variance (groups x stimuli x conditions x ears) resulted in a significant REA for normal children across all attentional conditions whereas learning-disabled did not produce a consistent REA across all attentional conditions, and in several instances, produced equivalent left and right hemisphere processing. Right hemispatial orientation increased the magnitude of the REA (i.e., left hemisphere processing) for both groups, whereas left hemispatial orientation increased the magnitude of the left ear report (i.e., right hemisphere processing) only in learning-disabled subjects. Focused attention to the right ear also increased left hemisphere efficiency for both groups of children; however, focused attention to the left ear produced symmetrical functioning by learning-disabled subjects. Congruent combinations of focused attention and hemispatial orientation were not found to enhance the REA beyond its magnitude when each strategy was assessed independently. When focused attention and hemispatial conditions were employed in opposing directions, normal children were more susceptible to the "rightward" direction regardless of the strategy whereas learning-disabled subjects were more susceptible to the "verbal" nature of the strategy. Higher overall processing performance was exhibited for CVC stimuli when compared to CV stimuli. These findings lend support to the hypothesis that hemispatial and asymmetrically focused attention strategies interact with structural mechanisms in producing the observed REA in dichotic listening and do so differentially for normal and learning-disabled children.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007859 Learning Disabilities Conditions characterized by a significant discrepancy between an individual's perceived level of intellect and their ability to acquire new language and other cognitive skills. These may result from organic or psychological conditions. Relatively common subtypes include DYSLEXIA, DYSCALCULIA, and DYSGRAPHIA. Adolescent Learning Disabilities,Adult Learning Disabilities,Child Learning Disabilities,Developmental Academic Disability,Developmental Academic Disorder,Developmental Disabilities of Scholastic Skills,Learning Disabilities, Adolescent,Learning Disabilities, Child,Learning Disorders,Academic Disorder, Developmental,Adult Learning Disorders,Developmental Disorders of Scholastic Skills,Learning Disorders, Adult,Learning Disturbance,Scholastic Skills Development Disorders,Academic Disabilities, Developmental,Academic Disability, Developmental,Academic Disorders, Developmental,Adolescent Learning Disability,Adult Learning Disability,Adult Learning Disorder,Child Learning Disability,Developmental Academic Disabilities,Developmental Academic Disorders,Disabilities, Adolescent Learning,Disabilities, Adult Learning,Disabilities, Child Learning,Disabilities, Developmental Academic,Disabilities, Learning,Disability, Adolescent Learning,Disability, Adult Learning,Disability, Child Learning,Disability, Developmental Academic,Disability, Learning,Disorder, Learning,Disorders, Adult Learning,Disorders, Learning,Disturbance, Learning,Disturbances, Learning,Learning Disabilities, Adult,Learning Disability,Learning Disability, Adolescent,Learning Disability, Adult,Learning Disability, Child,Learning Disorder,Learning Disorder, Adult,Learning Disturbances
D008297 Male Males
D009483 Neuropsychological Tests Tests designed to assess neurological function associated with certain behaviors. They are used in diagnosing brain dysfunction or damage and central nervous system disorders or injury. Aphasia Tests,Cognitive Test,Cognitive Testing,Cognitive Tests,Memory for Designs Test,Neuropsychological Testing,AX-CPT,Behavioral Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome,CANTAB,Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery,Clock Test,Cognitive Function Scanner,Continuous Performance Task,Controlled Oral Word Association Test,Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System,Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment,Hooper Visual Organization Test,NEPSY,Neuropsychologic Tests,Neuropsychological Test,Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test,Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status,Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure,Symbol Digit Modalities Test,Test of Everyday Attention,Test, Neuropsychological,Tests, Neuropsychological,Tower of London Test,Neuropsychologic Test,Test, Cognitive,Testing, Cognitive,Testing, Neuropsychological,Tests, Cognitive
D010700 Phonetics The science or study of speech sounds and their production, transmission, and reception, and their analysis, classification, and transcription. (Random House Unabridged Dictionary, 2d ed) Speech Sounds,Sound, Speech,Sounds, Speech,Speech Sound
D002648 Child A person 6 to 12 years of age. An individual 2 to 5 years old is CHILD, PRESCHOOL. Children
D004292 Dominance, Cerebral Dominance of one cerebral hemisphere over the other in cerebral functions. Cerebral Dominance,Hemispheric Specialization,Dominances, Cerebral,Specialization, Hemispheric
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000091402 Prohibitins Ubiquitously expressed conserved proteins associated with multiple functions including APOPTOSIS; CELL PROLIFERATION, regulations of various immune and mitochondrial functions, and cellular stress responses. Prohibitin 1 and prohibitin 2 form a ring-shaped complex in the INNER MITOCHONDRIAL MEMBRANE. Prohibitin
D000293 Adolescent A person 13 to 18 years of age. Adolescence,Youth,Adolescents,Adolescents, Female,Adolescents, Male,Teenagers,Teens,Adolescent, Female,Adolescent, Male,Female Adolescent,Female Adolescents,Male Adolescent,Male Adolescents,Teen,Teenager,Youths

Related Publications

C A Boliek, and J E Obrzut, and D Shaw
January 1984, Neuropsychologia,
C A Boliek, and J E Obrzut, and D Shaw
August 1977, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association,
C A Boliek, and J E Obrzut, and D Shaw
December 1993, Neuropsychologia,
C A Boliek, and J E Obrzut, and D Shaw
September 1980, Brain and language,
C A Boliek, and J E Obrzut, and D Shaw
July 1981, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association,
C A Boliek, and J E Obrzut, and D Shaw
December 1979, Journal of experimental child psychology,
C A Boliek, and J E Obrzut, and D Shaw
February 1994, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology,
C A Boliek, and J E Obrzut, and D Shaw
April 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology,
C A Boliek, and J E Obrzut, and D Shaw
November 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology,
C A Boliek, and J E Obrzut, and D Shaw
January 1973, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association,
Copied contents to your clipboard!