Evaluation of the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell mutagenesis assay: interlaboratory reproducibility and assessment. 1988

W J Caspary, and D S Daston, and B C Myhr, and A D Mitchell, and C J Rudd, and P S Lee
Cellular and Genetic Toxicology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

The L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell mutagenesis assay is used to detect the mutagenic activity of chemicals in a mammalian cell system. To evaluate this assay we compared the results of assays performed independently on 63 chemicals by laboratories at SRI International and Litton Bionetics, Inc. The two laboratories used similar protocols. The solvent and positive control mutant frequencies and cloning efficiencies obtained by the two laboratories were similar, which justified the use of the same quality-control criteria and analytical procedures for analyzing the results from both laboratories. The rate of concordance between the two laboratories was 92% for tests in the absence of S9 activation and 95% for tests in its presence. The results of the assays agreed for 57 of the 63 chemicals; three chemicals could not be compared because there were questionable calls in at least one of the laboratories; the results disagreed for the three remaining chemicals. The concordance rate for these overall assay evaluations was 95%. The interlaboratory concordance rates were similar to concordance rates for replicate experiments within the laboratories (96% at LBI, 94% at SRI). The mouse lymphoma cell mutagenicity results are concordant with the rodent chronic assay results in 78% of 50 chemicals and with the Salmonella assay results in 79% of 56 chemicals. Fifteen carcinogens were examined for genotoxic effects in mouse lymphoma, Salmonella, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) chromosomal aberration, and CHO sister chromatid exchange assay. Eight of these were positive in all four assays. Of the seven noncarcinogens that were tested in these four assays, none was negative in all four. The main conclusion to be drawn from this study is that the mouse lymphoma cell forward mutation assay, as performed and evaluated in this study, detects chemical mutagenicity in a manner that is highly consistent with other genetic endpoints as well as rodent carcinogenicity studies. Thus the assay quality control and response criteria established in this study led not only to a high degree of reproducibility but also to an apparently reliable detection of mutagenic activity.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007940 Leukemia L5178 An experimental lymphocytic leukemia of mice. Lymphoma L5178,L5178, Leukemia,L5178, Lymphoma
D009152 Mutagenicity Tests Tests of chemical substances and physical agents for mutagenic potential. They include microbial, insect, mammalian cell, and whole animal tests. Genetic Toxicity Tests,Genotoxicity Tests,Mutagen Screening,Tests, Genetic Toxicity,Toxicity Tests, Genetic,Genetic Toxicity Test,Genotoxicity Test,Mutagen Screenings,Mutagenicity Test,Screening, Mutagen,Screenings, Mutagen,Test, Genotoxicity,Tests, Genotoxicity,Toxicity Test, Genetic
D009153 Mutagens Chemical agents that increase the rate of genetic mutation by interfering with the function of nucleic acids. A clastogen is a specific mutagen that causes breaks in chromosomes. Clastogen,Clastogens,Genotoxin,Genotoxins,Mutagen
D009154 Mutation Any detectable and heritable change in the genetic material that causes a change in the GENOTYPE and which is transmitted to daughter cells and to succeeding generations. Mutations
D011232 Chemical Precipitation The formation of a solid in a solution as a result of a chemical reaction or the aggregation of soluble substances into complexes large enough to fall out of solution. Precipitation, Chemical
D011237 Predictive Value of Tests In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Negative Predictive Value,Positive Predictive Value,Predictive Value Of Test,Predictive Values Of Tests,Negative Predictive Values,Positive Predictive Values,Predictive Value, Negative,Predictive Value, Positive
D011786 Quality Control A system for verifying and maintaining a desired level of quality in a product or process by careful planning, use of proper equipment, continued inspection, and corrective action as required. (Random House Unabridged Dictionary, 2d ed) Control, Quality,Controls, Quality,Quality Controls
D002452 Cell Count The number of CELLS of a specific kind, usually measured per unit volume or area of sample. Cell Density,Cell Number,Cell Counts,Cell Densities,Cell Numbers,Count, Cell,Counts, Cell,Densities, Cell,Density, Cell,Number, Cell,Numbers, Cell
D002999 Clone Cells A group of genetically identical cells all descended from a single common ancestral cell by mitosis in eukaryotes or by binary fission in prokaryotes. Clone cells also include populations of recombinant DNA molecules all carrying the same inserted sequence. (From King & Stansfield, Dictionary of Genetics, 4th ed) Clones,Cell, Clone,Cells, Clone,Clone,Clone Cell
D004305 Dose-Response Relationship, Drug The relationship between the dose of an administered drug and the response of the organism to the drug. Dose Response Relationship, Drug,Dose-Response Relationships, Drug,Drug Dose-Response Relationship,Drug Dose-Response Relationships,Relationship, Drug Dose-Response,Relationships, Drug Dose-Response

Related Publications

W J Caspary, and D S Daston, and B C Myhr, and A D Mitchell, and C J Rudd, and P S Lee
January 1988, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis,
W J Caspary, and D S Daston, and B C Myhr, and A D Mitchell, and C J Rudd, and P S Lee
January 1988, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis,
W J Caspary, and D S Daston, and B C Myhr, and A D Mitchell, and C J Rudd, and P S Lee
January 1988, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis,
W J Caspary, and D S Daston, and B C Myhr, and A D Mitchell, and C J Rudd, and P S Lee
November 1981, Mutation research,
W J Caspary, and D S Daston, and B C Myhr, and A D Mitchell, and C J Rudd, and P S Lee
January 1988, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis,
W J Caspary, and D S Daston, and B C Myhr, and A D Mitchell, and C J Rudd, and P S Lee
April 1978, Mutation research,
W J Caspary, and D S Daston, and B C Myhr, and A D Mitchell, and C J Rudd, and P S Lee
January 1990, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis,
W J Caspary, and D S Daston, and B C Myhr, and A D Mitchell, and C J Rudd, and P S Lee
February 1981, Photochemistry and photobiology,
W J Caspary, and D S Daston, and B C Myhr, and A D Mitchell, and C J Rudd, and P S Lee
February 1984, Mutation research,
W J Caspary, and D S Daston, and B C Myhr, and A D Mitchell, and C J Rudd, and P S Lee
March 1982, Journal of toxicology and environmental health,
Copied contents to your clipboard!