Avascular necrosis versus other diseases of the hip: sensitivity of MR imaging. 1988

M F Glickstein, and D L Burk, and M L Schiebler, and E K Cohen, and M K Dalinka, and M E Steinberg, and H Y Kressel
Jefferson X-Ray Group, Inc, Hartford, Conn.

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the hip has been useful in the examination of patients for the presence of avascular necrosis (AVN). In the detection of AVN, MR imaging is more sensitive than computed tomography or nuclear scintigraphy. This study assessed the usefulness of MR imaging in the differentiation of AVN from other hip diseases. Twenty-two cases of non-AVN hip disease were matched with 23 biopsy-proved cases of AVN and ten normal controls. MR images were rated in a blinded manner by five experienced radiologists, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed on the data. In the discrimination of AVN from other hip diseases or from normality, the A(z) value (the area under the ROC curve) was 98.6. With a specificity of 98%, MR imaging was 97% sensitive in the differentiation of AVN from normality, 85% sensitive in the differentiation of AVN from non-AVN disease, and 91% sensitive in the differentiation of AVN from both conditions. MR imaging may therefore help discriminate between AVN and other hip diseases.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008279 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Non-invasive method of demonstrating internal anatomy based on the principle that atomic nuclei in a strong magnetic field absorb pulses of radiofrequency energy and emit them as radiowaves which can be reconstructed into computerized images. The concept includes proton spin tomographic techniques. Chemical Shift Imaging,MR Tomography,MRI Scans,MRI, Functional,Magnetic Resonance Image,Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Functional,Magnetization Transfer Contrast Imaging,NMR Imaging,NMR Tomography,Tomography, NMR,Tomography, Proton Spin,fMRI,Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Imaging, Chemical Shift,Proton Spin Tomography,Spin Echo Imaging,Steady-State Free Precession MRI,Tomography, MR,Zeugmatography,Chemical Shift Imagings,Echo Imaging, Spin,Echo Imagings, Spin,Functional MRI,Functional MRIs,Image, Magnetic Resonance,Imaging, Magnetic Resonance,Imaging, NMR,Imaging, Spin Echo,Imagings, Chemical Shift,Imagings, Spin Echo,MRI Scan,MRIs, Functional,Magnetic Resonance Images,Resonance Image, Magnetic,Scan, MRI,Scans, MRI,Shift Imaging, Chemical,Shift Imagings, Chemical,Spin Echo Imagings,Steady State Free Precession MRI
D003937 Diagnosis, Differential Determination of which one of two or more diseases or conditions a patient is suffering from by systematically comparing and contrasting results of diagnostic measures. Diagnoses, Differential,Differential Diagnoses,Differential Diagnosis
D005271 Femur Head Necrosis Aseptic or avascular necrosis of the femoral head. The major types are idiopathic (primary), as a complication of fractures or dislocations, and LEGG-CALVE-PERTHES DISEASE. Aseptic Necrosis of Femur Head,Avascular Necrosis of Femur Head,Necrosis, Aseptic, of Femur Head,Necrosis, Avascular, of Femur Head,Avascular Necrosis Of Femoral Head, Primary,Femoral Head, Avascular Necrosis Of,Ischemic Necrosis Of Femoral Head,Femur Head Necroses,Head Necrosis, Femur,Necrosis, Femur Head
D006615 Hip The projecting part on each side of the body, formed by the side of the pelvis and the top portion of the femur. Coxa,Coxas,Hips
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D012372 ROC Curve A graphic means for assessing the ability of a screening test to discriminate between healthy and diseased persons; may also be used in other studies, e.g., distinguishing stimuli responses as to a faint stimuli or nonstimuli. ROC Analysis,Receiver Operating Characteristic,Analysis, ROC,Analyses, ROC,Characteristic, Receiver Operating,Characteristics, Receiver Operating,Curve, ROC,Curves, ROC,ROC Analyses,ROC Curves,Receiver Operating Characteristics

Related Publications

M F Glickstein, and D L Burk, and M L Schiebler, and E K Cohen, and M K Dalinka, and M E Steinberg, and H Y Kressel
September 1986, Radiology,
M F Glickstein, and D L Burk, and M L Schiebler, and E K Cohen, and M K Dalinka, and M E Steinberg, and H Y Kressel
October 1988, Radiology,
M F Glickstein, and D L Burk, and M L Schiebler, and E K Cohen, and M K Dalinka, and M E Steinberg, and H Y Kressel
July 1989, Radiology,
M F Glickstein, and D L Burk, and M L Schiebler, and E K Cohen, and M K Dalinka, and M E Steinberg, and H Y Kressel
August 1991, Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America,
M F Glickstein, and D L Burk, and M L Schiebler, and E K Cohen, and M K Dalinka, and M E Steinberg, and H Y Kressel
July 1986, AJR. American journal of roentgenology,
M F Glickstein, and D L Burk, and M L Schiebler, and E K Cohen, and M K Dalinka, and M E Steinberg, and H Y Kressel
August 1988, Radiology,
M F Glickstein, and D L Burk, and M L Schiebler, and E K Cohen, and M K Dalinka, and M E Steinberg, and H Y Kressel
March 1993, Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai zasshi. Nippon acta radiologica,
M F Glickstein, and D L Burk, and M L Schiebler, and E K Cohen, and M K Dalinka, and M E Steinberg, and H Y Kressel
December 1986, AJR. American journal of roentgenology,
M F Glickstein, and D L Burk, and M L Schiebler, and E K Cohen, and M K Dalinka, and M E Steinberg, and H Y Kressel
January 1994, British journal of hospital medicine,
M F Glickstein, and D L Burk, and M L Schiebler, and E K Cohen, and M K Dalinka, and M E Steinberg, and H Y Kressel
March 2000, American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.),
Copied contents to your clipboard!