Cone beam computed tomography based image guidance and quality assessment of prostate cancer for magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy in the pelvis. 2021

Jens M Edmund, and Daniel Andreasen, and Koen Van Leemput
Radiotherapy Research Unit, Department of Oncology, Gentofte and Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.

OBJECTIVE Radiotherapy (RT) based on magentic resonance imaging (MRI) only is currently used clinically in the pelvis. A synthetic computed tomography (sCT) is needed for dose planning. Here, we investigate the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) based MRI-only image guided RT (IGRT) and sCT image quality. METHODS CT, MRI and CBCT scans of ten prostate cancer patients were included. The MRI was converted to a sCT using a multi-atlas approach. The sCT, CT and MR images were auto-matched with the CBCT on the bony anatomy. Paired sCT-CT and sCT-CBCT data were created. CT numbers were converted to relative electron (RED) and mass densities (DES) using a standard calibration curve for the CT and sCT. For the CBCT RED/DES conversion, a phantom and paired CT-CBCT population based calibration curve was used. For the latter, the CBCT numbers were averaged in 100 HU bins and the known RED/DES of the CT were assigned. The paired sCT-CT and sCT-CBCT data were averaged in bins of 10 HU or 0.01 RED/DES. The median absolute error (MeAE) between the sCT-CT and sCT-CBCT bins was calculated. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were carried out for the IGRT and MeAE study. RESULTS The mean sCT or MR IGRT difference from CT was ≤ 2 mm but significant differences were observed. A CBCT HU or phantom-based RED/DES MeAE did not estimate the sCT quality similar to a CT based MeAE but the CBCT population-based RED/DES MeAE did. CONCLUSIONS MRI-only CBCT-based IGRT seems feasible but caution is advised. A MeAE around 0.1 DES could call for sCT quality inspection.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Jens M Edmund, and Daniel Andreasen, and Koen Van Leemput
July 2023, Physics and imaging in radiation oncology,
Jens M Edmund, and Daniel Andreasen, and Koen Van Leemput
January 2021, Physics and imaging in radiation oncology,
Jens M Edmund, and Daniel Andreasen, and Koen Van Leemput
October 2019, Physics and imaging in radiation oncology,
Jens M Edmund, and Daniel Andreasen, and Koen Van Leemput
August 2009, Clinical oral implants research,
Jens M Edmund, and Daniel Andreasen, and Koen Van Leemput
July 2023, Physics and imaging in radiation oncology,
Jens M Edmund, and Daniel Andreasen, and Koen Van Leemput
June 2020, Imaging science in dentistry,
Jens M Edmund, and Daniel Andreasen, and Koen Van Leemput
May 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics,
Jens M Edmund, and Daniel Andreasen, and Koen Van Leemput
January 2015, PloS one,
Jens M Edmund, and Daniel Andreasen, and Koen Van Leemput
May 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics,
Copied contents to your clipboard!