Cervical cancer screening using HPV tests on self-samples: attitudes and preferences of women participating in the VALHUDES study. 2021

Hélène De Pauw, and Gilbert Donders, and Steven Weyers, and Philippe De Sutter, and Jean Doyen, and Wiebren A A Tjalma, and Davy Vanden Broeck, and Eliana Peeters, and Severien Van Keer, and Alex Vorsters, and Marc Arbyn
Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, J. Wytsmanstreet 14, B1050, Brussels, Belgium.

BACKGROUND Interventions to reach women who do not participate regularly in screening may reduce the risk of cervical cancer. Self-collection of a vaginal specimen has been shown to increase participation. The relative clinical accuracy of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on first-void urine (with Colli-Pee) and on vaginal self-samples versus on cervical clinician-collected samples is being investigated in the VALHUDES trial. The current study assesses attitudes and experiences regarding self-sampling among women enrolled in VALHUDES. METHODS Questionnaires from 515 women (age 25-64 years [N = 498]; < 25 [N = 10], age ≥ 65 [N = 3], enrolled between December 2017 - January 2020) referred to colposcopy because of previous cervical abnormalities and enrolled in VALHUDES (NCT03064087) were analysed. RESULTS Of the 515 participants, nearly all women confirmed that self-sampling may help in reaching under-screened women (93%). Nevertheless, 44% of the participants stated before starting collection that a clinician-collected sample is more effective than a self-collected sample. After self-sampling, the large majority of women (> 95%) declared that instructions for self-collection were clear, that collection was easy, and that they were confident about having performed the procedure correctly, for both urine and vaginal collection. However, a proportion of women found self-sampling unpleasant (9.5% [49/515] for urine collection; 18.6% [96/515] and 15.5% [80/515] for vaginal sampling with cotton swabs or plastic brushes, respectively). For their next screening round, 57% would prefer self-sampling whereas 41% opted for collection by a clinician. Among women preferring self-sampling, 53% would choose for urine collection, 38% for vaginal self-collection and 9% had no preference. Age did not modify preferences. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that both urine and vaginal self-sampling are well accepted by women, with a preference for urine sampling. Although the large majority of women are confident in their ability to perform self-sampling, four to five over ten women preferred specimen collection by a clinician. BACKGROUND The study VALHUDES was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03064087 ).

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Hélène De Pauw, and Gilbert Donders, and Steven Weyers, and Philippe De Sutter, and Jean Doyen, and Wiebren A A Tjalma, and Davy Vanden Broeck, and Eliana Peeters, and Severien Van Keer, and Alex Vorsters, and Marc Arbyn
February 2023, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology,
Hélène De Pauw, and Gilbert Donders, and Steven Weyers, and Philippe De Sutter, and Jean Doyen, and Wiebren A A Tjalma, and Davy Vanden Broeck, and Eliana Peeters, and Severien Van Keer, and Alex Vorsters, and Marc Arbyn
January 2021, Journal of lower genital tract disease,
Hélène De Pauw, and Gilbert Donders, and Steven Weyers, and Philippe De Sutter, and Jean Doyen, and Wiebren A A Tjalma, and Davy Vanden Broeck, and Eliana Peeters, and Severien Van Keer, and Alex Vorsters, and Marc Arbyn
January 2013, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases,
Hélène De Pauw, and Gilbert Donders, and Steven Weyers, and Philippe De Sutter, and Jean Doyen, and Wiebren A A Tjalma, and Davy Vanden Broeck, and Eliana Peeters, and Severien Van Keer, and Alex Vorsters, and Marc Arbyn
May 2021, BMJ global health,
Hélène De Pauw, and Gilbert Donders, and Steven Weyers, and Philippe De Sutter, and Jean Doyen, and Wiebren A A Tjalma, and Davy Vanden Broeck, and Eliana Peeters, and Severien Van Keer, and Alex Vorsters, and Marc Arbyn
May 1991, Health bulletin,
Hélène De Pauw, and Gilbert Donders, and Steven Weyers, and Philippe De Sutter, and Jean Doyen, and Wiebren A A Tjalma, and Davy Vanden Broeck, and Eliana Peeters, and Severien Van Keer, and Alex Vorsters, and Marc Arbyn
June 2019, BMC women's health,
Hélène De Pauw, and Gilbert Donders, and Steven Weyers, and Philippe De Sutter, and Jean Doyen, and Wiebren A A Tjalma, and Davy Vanden Broeck, and Eliana Peeters, and Severien Van Keer, and Alex Vorsters, and Marc Arbyn
July 2014, Preventive medicine,
Hélène De Pauw, and Gilbert Donders, and Steven Weyers, and Philippe De Sutter, and Jean Doyen, and Wiebren A A Tjalma, and Davy Vanden Broeck, and Eliana Peeters, and Severien Van Keer, and Alex Vorsters, and Marc Arbyn
August 2022, Vaccines,
Hélène De Pauw, and Gilbert Donders, and Steven Weyers, and Philippe De Sutter, and Jean Doyen, and Wiebren A A Tjalma, and Davy Vanden Broeck, and Eliana Peeters, and Severien Van Keer, and Alex Vorsters, and Marc Arbyn
July 2019, BMC public health,
Hélène De Pauw, and Gilbert Donders, and Steven Weyers, and Philippe De Sutter, and Jean Doyen, and Wiebren A A Tjalma, and Davy Vanden Broeck, and Eliana Peeters, and Severien Van Keer, and Alex Vorsters, and Marc Arbyn
January 2019, Acta cytologica,
Copied contents to your clipboard!