Design of a Tennis-Specific Agility Test (TAT) for Monitoring Tennis Players. 2021

Marleen G T Jansen, and Marije T Elferink-Gemser, and Aldo E Hoekstra, and Irene R Faber, and Barbara C H Huijgen
Centre for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Agility is an important ability for tennis players. To be successful in the rallies, players must perform rapid, multidirectional movements in response to the ball and/or the position of the opponent. For a test to be representative in monitoring agility performance, it should capture a combination of the physical and cognitive agility performance. Considering that literature reports no reliable and valid sport-specific agility test for tennis, the aim of this article was to design and evaluate the measurement properties of a Tennis-specific Agility Test (TAT). To evaluate the TAT, test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and feasibility were assessed. For reproducibility, a two-way mixed ANOVA was performed. Concurrent validity was assessed using Pearson correlations. A total of 69 tennis players participated in this study of whom 16 competed at the international (22 ± 3.7 years, playing level (Dynamic Rating System): .8 ± .3), 43 at the national (14 ± 1.4 years, playing level: 4.6 ± 1.4), and 10 at the regional level (15 ± 0.8 years, playing level: 4.9 ± 1.1). Test-retest reliability was found to be moderate with an Intra-Class Correlation coefficient (ICC) of .74 (p < .01) and a percentual minimal detectable change (%MDC) of 6.2%. Concurrent validity was found to be moderate by comparison with a recognised agility test, the Spider Drill, which measures only the physical component (.70; p < .01), and by comparison with tennis performance for both boys (r = .67; p < .01) and girls (r = .72; p < .01). The feasibility was high with short time for preparation (five to ten minutes) and time per participant (<5 minutes). In conclusion, the TAT shows promising results for assessing sport-specific agility performance in tennis making it likely to be used in the practical setting.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Marleen G T Jansen, and Marije T Elferink-Gemser, and Aldo E Hoekstra, and Irene R Faber, and Barbara C H Huijgen
August 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health,
Marleen G T Jansen, and Marije T Elferink-Gemser, and Aldo E Hoekstra, and Irene R Faber, and Barbara C H Huijgen
March 2011, Journal of sports sciences,
Marleen G T Jansen, and Marije T Elferink-Gemser, and Aldo E Hoekstra, and Irene R Faber, and Barbara C H Huijgen
December 2025, Scientific reports,
Marleen G T Jansen, and Marije T Elferink-Gemser, and Aldo E Hoekstra, and Irene R Faber, and Barbara C H Huijgen
June 2017, Journal of human kinetics,
Marleen G T Jansen, and Marije T Elferink-Gemser, and Aldo E Hoekstra, and Irene R Faber, and Barbara C H Huijgen
November 2016, International journal of sports physiology and performance,
Marleen G T Jansen, and Marije T Elferink-Gemser, and Aldo E Hoekstra, and Irene R Faber, and Barbara C H Huijgen
January 2019, Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation,
Marleen G T Jansen, and Marije T Elferink-Gemser, and Aldo E Hoekstra, and Irene R Faber, and Barbara C H Huijgen
January 2016, PloS one,
Marleen G T Jansen, and Marije T Elferink-Gemser, and Aldo E Hoekstra, and Irene R Faber, and Barbara C H Huijgen
January 2023, Frontiers in sports and active living,
Marleen G T Jansen, and Marije T Elferink-Gemser, and Aldo E Hoekstra, and Irene R Faber, and Barbara C H Huijgen
March 2015, International journal of sports physiology and performance,
Marleen G T Jansen, and Marije T Elferink-Gemser, and Aldo E Hoekstra, and Irene R Faber, and Barbara C H Huijgen
June 2015, Journal of human kinetics,
Copied contents to your clipboard!