-transparent.png){kind=logo}
Three types of bone-single-crystal sapphire implant interfaces were histologically determined in submergible and supramergible implant: direct bone apposition (type I), thin connective tissue with poor collagen fibers (type II), and dense fibrous connective tissue (type III). Type I interface was predominant and type III interface was sparsely seen in submergible implants. In contrast to these findings, type III interfaces frequently appeared in supramergible implants, primarily at the apical region. These differences were considered to occur by the biomechanical variable of postoperative healing.
Related Publications
Y Akagawa, and
M Hashimoto, and
N Kondo, and
K Satomi, and
T Takata, and
H Tsuru
January 1983,
The Journal of oral implantology,
Y Akagawa, and
M Hashimoto, and
N Kondo, and
K Satomi, and
T Takata, and
H Tsuru
January 1982,
The Journal of oral implantology,
Y Akagawa, and
M Hashimoto, and
N Kondo, and
K Satomi, and
T Takata, and
H Tsuru
November 1989,
Journal of oral rehabilitation,
Y Akagawa, and
M Hashimoto, and
N Kondo, and
K Satomi, and
T Takata, and
H Tsuru
January 1983,
The Journal of oral implantology,
Y Akagawa, and
M Hashimoto, and
N Kondo, and
K Satomi, and
T Takata, and
H Tsuru
March 1996,
Clinical oral implants research,
Y Akagawa, and
M Hashimoto, and
N Kondo, and
K Satomi, and
T Takata, and
H Tsuru
December 1990,
Clinical oral implants research,
Y Akagawa, and
M Hashimoto, and
N Kondo, and
K Satomi, and
T Takata, and
H Tsuru
March 1992,
Oral health,
Y Akagawa, and
M Hashimoto, and
N Kondo, and
K Satomi, and
T Takata, and
H Tsuru
October 1985,
Die Quintessenz,
Y Akagawa, and
M Hashimoto, and
N Kondo, and
K Satomi, and
T Takata, and
H Tsuru
June 1993,
The Journal of prosthetic dentistry,
Y Akagawa, and
M Hashimoto, and
N Kondo, and
K Satomi, and
T Takata, and
H Tsuru
December 1983,
Journal of dental research,
