Totally implantable venous access ports: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing subclavian and internal jugular vein punctures. 2022

Ya Zhou, and Yanqiu Lan, and Qiang Zhang, and Jifang Song, and Juan He, and Na Peng, and Xingqiao Peng, and Xinxin Yang
Department of Oncology, Chongqing General Hospital, Chomgqing, China.

BACKGROUND Totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) is a completely closed intravenous infusion system that stays in the human body for a long time. It is used for the infusion of strong irritating or hyperosmotic drugs, nutritional support treatment, blood transfusion and blood specimen collection, and other purposes. There are two common ways of TIVAP: internal jugular vein implantation and subclavian vein implantation. However, the postoperative complications of the two implantation methods are quite different, and there is no recommended implantation method in the relevant guidelines. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the difference in complications of the two implantation methods, and choose the better implantation method. METHODS Computer search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library database was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the establishment of the database to October 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies. RevMan5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. RESULTS A total of 1086 patients in five studies were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of infection (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.43-1.48, p = .47), catheter blockage (RR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.15-3.46, p = .68), port squeeze (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.14-8.02, p = .95), catheter-related thrombosis (RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.22-3.38, p = 0.83), catheter displacement (RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.22-1.12, p = .09), extravasation (RR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.01-2.15, p = .15), and catheter rupture (RR = 3.77, 95% CI: 0.16-89.76, p = .41) between the two implantation paths. CONCLUSIONS There is little difference in the complication rate of TIVAP between internal jugular vein insertion and subclavian vein insertion. Due to the small number of included studies, there are certain limitations, and more studies need to be included for analysis in the future.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007601 Jugular Veins Veins in the neck which drain the brain, face, and neck into the brachiocephalic or subclavian veins. Jugular Vein,Vein, Jugular,Veins, Jugular
D011677 Punctures Incision of tissues for injection of medication or for other diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. Punctures of the skin, for example may be used for diagnostic drainage; of blood vessels for diagnostic imaging procedures. Micropunctures,Micropuncture,Puncture
D002405 Catheterization, Central Venous Placement of an intravenous CATHETER in the subclavian, jugular, or other central vein. Central Venous Catheterization,Venous Catheterization, Central,Catheterization, Central,Central Catheterization,Catheterizations, Central,Catheterizations, Central Venous,Central Catheterizations,Central Venous Catheterizations,Venous Catheterizations, Central
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D016121 Brachiocephalic Veins Large veins on either side of the root of the neck formed by the junction of the internal jugular and subclavian veins. They drain blood from the head, neck, and upper extremities, and unite to form the superior vena cava. Innominate Veins,Brachiocephalic Vein,Innominate Vein,Vein, Brachiocephalic,Vein, Innominate,Veins, Brachiocephalic,Veins, Innominate
D062905 Central Venous Catheters Catheters that are inserted into a large central vein such as a SUBCLAVIAN VEIN or FEMORAL VEIN. Central Venous Catheter,Catheter, Central Venous,Catheters, Central Venous,Venous Catheter, Central,Venous Catheters, Central

Related Publications

Ya Zhou, and Yanqiu Lan, and Qiang Zhang, and Jifang Song, and Juan He, and Na Peng, and Xingqiao Peng, and Xinxin Yang
February 2021, Journal of pediatric surgery,
Ya Zhou, and Yanqiu Lan, and Qiang Zhang, and Jifang Song, and Juan He, and Na Peng, and Xingqiao Peng, and Xinxin Yang
February 2012, Pediatric blood & cancer,
Ya Zhou, and Yanqiu Lan, and Qiang Zhang, and Jifang Song, and Juan He, and Na Peng, and Xingqiao Peng, and Xinxin Yang
September 2016, BMC cancer,
Ya Zhou, and Yanqiu Lan, and Qiang Zhang, and Jifang Song, and Juan He, and Na Peng, and Xingqiao Peng, and Xinxin Yang
September 2020, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH,
Ya Zhou, and Yanqiu Lan, and Qiang Zhang, and Jifang Song, and Juan He, and Na Peng, and Xingqiao Peng, and Xinxin Yang
September 2011, European journal of radiology,
Ya Zhou, and Yanqiu Lan, and Qiang Zhang, and Jifang Song, and Juan He, and Na Peng, and Xingqiao Peng, and Xinxin Yang
January 2024, Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA,
Ya Zhou, and Yanqiu Lan, and Qiang Zhang, and Jifang Song, and Juan He, and Na Peng, and Xingqiao Peng, and Xinxin Yang
January 2014, The British journal of surgery,
Ya Zhou, and Yanqiu Lan, and Qiang Zhang, and Jifang Song, and Juan He, and Na Peng, and Xingqiao Peng, and Xinxin Yang
May 2008, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology,
Ya Zhou, and Yanqiu Lan, and Qiang Zhang, and Jifang Song, and Juan He, and Na Peng, and Xingqiao Peng, and Xinxin Yang
January 2006, Chirurgia italiana,
Ya Zhou, and Yanqiu Lan, and Qiang Zhang, and Jifang Song, and Juan He, and Na Peng, and Xingqiao Peng, and Xinxin Yang
November 2011, Journal of surgical oncology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!