Recently a theory (Zhaoping, Vision Research, 136, 32-49, 2017) proposed that top-down feedback from higher to lower visual cortical areas, to aid visual recognition, is stronger in the central than in the peripheral visual fields. Since top-down feedback helps feature binding, a critical visual recognition process, this theory predicts that insufficient feedback in the periphery should make feature misbinding more likely. To test this prediction, this study assessed binding between color and motion features, or between luminance and motion features, at different visual field eccentricities. We first used color-motion stimuli containing equiluminant red and green dots moving in opposite directions, for example, red dots moved leftward while green dots moved rightward. Such stimuli were shown in both a central reference strip and a peripheral test strip; participants reported whether it was the first or second interval in a trial in which the dots of each color moved in the opposite directions between the two strips. The center of the test strip was at 4° or 15° away from the gaze fixation. Participants' performance was much worse when the test strip was more peripheral, suggesting that feature misbinding occurred more frequently there. This held even when the size and density of the dots were adjusted by eccentricity-dependent cortical magnification factors, and even when red/green dots were replaced by yellow/blue dots or black/white dots to suit the retinal input sampling peripherally. Our findings support that top-down feedback is more directed to central vision, which can resolve ambiguities in feature binding at more central visual locations.