There are serious methodological problems in studies which report contralateral visual masking. Contralateral masking occurs when detection of a hemifield target stimulus is impaired by a pattern-masking stimulus presented to the opposite hemifield. We demonstrate that, in studies which used positive stimuli (i.e., black letters on a white field), contralateral masking may be an artifact. Although we observed contralateral masking when positive stimuli were presented, there was no evidence of masking with negative stimuli (i.e., white letters on a black field). A special masking stimulus with a positive mask contralateral to the target and a black hemifield ipsilateral to the target also failed to produce masking. Contralateral masking in this experiment was due to the flash of light in the field ipsilateral to the target; it was this ipsilateral stimulation, rather than contralateral interference, which impeded target recognition.