Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for pain management after gastrectomy: a randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial. 2022

Heejoon Jeong, and Ji Won Choi, and Woo Seog Sim, and Duk Kyung Kim, and Yu Jeong Bang, and Soyoon Park, and Hyean Yeo, and Hara Kim
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Open gastrectomy causes severe postoperative pain. Therefore, we investigated the opioid-sparing effect of the ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) after open gastrectomy. Adult patients undergoing open gastrectomy were randomly assigned to either the ESPB group (ESPB + fentanyl based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia [IV-PCA]) or a control group (fentanyl based IV-PCA only). The primary outcome was total fentanyl equivalent consumption during the first 24 hour postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were pain intensities using a numeric rating scale at the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 hour postoperatively, and the amount of fentanyl equivalent consumption during the PACU stay and at 3, 6, and 12 hour postoperatively, and the time to the first request for rescue analgesia. Fifty-eight patients were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference in total fentanyl equivalent consumption during the first 24 hour postoperatively between the two groups (P = 0.471). Pain intensities were not significantly different between the groups except during the PACU stay and 3 hour postoperatively (P < 0.001, for both). Time to the first rescue analgesia in the ward was longer in the ESPB group than the control group (P = 0.045). Ultrasound-guided ESPB did not decrease total fentanyl equivalent consumption during the first 24 hour after open gastrectomy. It only reduced postoperative pain intensity until 3 hour postoperatively compared with the control group. Ultrasound-guided single-shot ESPB cannot provide an efficient opioid-sparing effect after open gastrectomy.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Heejoon Jeong, and Ji Won Choi, and Woo Seog Sim, and Duk Kyung Kim, and Yu Jeong Bang, and Soyoon Park, and Hyean Yeo, and Hara Kim
September 2020, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia,
Heejoon Jeong, and Ji Won Choi, and Woo Seog Sim, and Duk Kyung Kim, and Yu Jeong Bang, and Soyoon Park, and Hyean Yeo, and Hara Kim
April 2019, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia,
Heejoon Jeong, and Ji Won Choi, and Woo Seog Sim, and Duk Kyung Kim, and Yu Jeong Bang, and Soyoon Park, and Hyean Yeo, and Hara Kim
January 2022, Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier),
Heejoon Jeong, and Ji Won Choi, and Woo Seog Sim, and Duk Kyung Kim, and Yu Jeong Bang, and Soyoon Park, and Hyean Yeo, and Hara Kim
January 2019, Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier),
Heejoon Jeong, and Ji Won Choi, and Woo Seog Sim, and Duk Kyung Kim, and Yu Jeong Bang, and Soyoon Park, and Hyean Yeo, and Hara Kim
November 2019, Journal of clinical anesthesia,
Heejoon Jeong, and Ji Won Choi, and Woo Seog Sim, and Duk Kyung Kim, and Yu Jeong Bang, and Soyoon Park, and Hyean Yeo, and Hara Kim
August 2019, Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine,
Heejoon Jeong, and Ji Won Choi, and Woo Seog Sim, and Duk Kyung Kim, and Yu Jeong Bang, and Soyoon Park, and Hyean Yeo, and Hara Kim
May 2018, Journal of clinical anesthesia,
Heejoon Jeong, and Ji Won Choi, and Woo Seog Sim, and Duk Kyung Kim, and Yu Jeong Bang, and Soyoon Park, and Hyean Yeo, and Hara Kim
September 2022, British journal of anaesthesia,
Heejoon Jeong, and Ji Won Choi, and Woo Seog Sim, and Duk Kyung Kim, and Yu Jeong Bang, and Soyoon Park, and Hyean Yeo, and Hara Kim
September 2023, Clinical therapeutics,
Heejoon Jeong, and Ji Won Choi, and Woo Seog Sim, and Duk Kyung Kim, and Yu Jeong Bang, and Soyoon Park, and Hyean Yeo, and Hara Kim
January 2020, Saudi journal of anaesthesia,
Copied contents to your clipboard!