Comparison of Gut Microbiota Diversity Between Captive and Wild Tokay Gecko (Gekko gecko). 2022

Sanqi Tang, and Yuhui Li, and Chengming Huang, and Shufa Yan, and Yongtai Li, and Zening Chen, and Zhengjun Wu
Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Guangxi Normal University), Ministry of Education, Guilin, China.

Captive animals and wild animals may exhibit different characteristics due to the heterogeneity of their living environments. The gut microbiota play an important role in the digestion and absorption, energy metabolism, immune regulation, and physiological health of the host. However, information about the gut microbiota of captive and wild Gekko gecko is currently limited. To determine the difference in gut microbiota community composition, diversity, and structure between captive and wild geckos, we used the Illumina miseq platform to conduct high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics analysis of the v3-v4 hypervariable region of 16S rRNA in 54 gecko samples. Our results showed that Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria were the dominant gut microbiota phyla of the gecko. The dominant genera comprised mainly Pseudomonas, Burkholderia-caballeronia-paraburkholderia, Ralstonia, Romboutsia, and Bacteroides. Captive geckos had significantly higher alpha diversity and potential pathogenic bacteria than wild populations. Moreover, significant differences in beta diversity of gut microbiota were observed between two populations. Functional prediction analysis showed that the relative abundance of functional pathways of wild geckos was more higher in metabolism, genetic information processing and organismal system function than those in captive geckos. Total length significantly affected gut microbial community (R2 = 0.4527, p = 0.001) and explained 10.45% of the total variation for gut microbial community variance between two groups. These results may be related to differences in diet and living environment between two populations, suggesting that the management of captive populations should mimic wild environments to the greatest extent possible to reduce the impact on their gut microbiota.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Sanqi Tang, and Yuhui Li, and Chengming Huang, and Shufa Yan, and Yongtai Li, and Zening Chen, and Zhengjun Wu
July 2019, BMC veterinary research,
Sanqi Tang, and Yuhui Li, and Chengming Huang, and Shufa Yan, and Yongtai Li, and Zening Chen, and Zhengjun Wu
September 2020, Veterinary ophthalmology,
Sanqi Tang, and Yuhui Li, and Chengming Huang, and Shufa Yan, and Yongtai Li, and Zening Chen, and Zhengjun Wu
March 1968, Acta oto-laryngologica,
Sanqi Tang, and Yuhui Li, and Chengming Huang, and Shufa Yan, and Yongtai Li, and Zening Chen, and Zhengjun Wu
October 2011, Mitochondrial DNA,
Sanqi Tang, and Yuhui Li, and Chengming Huang, and Shufa Yan, and Yongtai Li, and Zening Chen, and Zhengjun Wu
March 2016, Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections,
Sanqi Tang, and Yuhui Li, and Chengming Huang, and Shufa Yan, and Yongtai Li, and Zening Chen, and Zhengjun Wu
June 1994, Vision research,
Sanqi Tang, and Yuhui Li, and Chengming Huang, and Shufa Yan, and Yongtai Li, and Zening Chen, and Zhengjun Wu
February 2020, Journal of morphology,
Sanqi Tang, and Yuhui Li, and Chengming Huang, and Shufa Yan, and Yongtai Li, and Zening Chen, and Zhengjun Wu
July 2012, Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.),
Sanqi Tang, and Yuhui Li, and Chengming Huang, and Shufa Yan, and Yongtai Li, and Zening Chen, and Zhengjun Wu
January 1974, Brain, behavior and evolution,
Sanqi Tang, and Yuhui Li, and Chengming Huang, and Shufa Yan, and Yongtai Li, and Zening Chen, and Zhengjun Wu
January 2017, Zoomorphology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!