Generalized force fields (FFs) act as extensions to biomolecular FFs to provide a wide coverage of organic molecules. However, their precise application to an arbitrary molecule presents a separate challenge. We show that MATCH assigns different atom types and bonded and nonbonded parameters than CGenFF, and the AM1-BCC charge model, commonly used with GAFF/GAFF2, does not exactly reproduce the performance of the RESP charge model. The results indicate the need for caution when employing FFs to ensure their integrity with respect to their implementation and validation.