Bunk space requirements for growing beef cattle limit-fed a high-energy corn and corn co-product diet. 2022

Zachary M Duncan, and Zachary L DeBord, and Madison G Pflughoeft, and Kyler J Suhr, and William R Hollenbeck, and Anthony J Tarpoff, and K C Olson, and Dale A Blasi
Department of Animal Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.

Bunk requirements for optimal growth performance of growing calves limit-fed high-energy corn and corn co-product diets have not been widely evaluated. Three-hundred eighty-five crossbred steers (initial body weight = 215 ± 25 kg) were purchased in Texas, transported to the Kansas State Beef Stocker Unit, and weighed at arrival. Steers were stratified by body weight and randomly assigned to 1 of 28 pens containing 12 to 14 head. Within block, pens were randomly assigned to one of four bunk allotment treatments: 25.4, 38.1, 50.8, or 63.5 cm of bunk per head for a 58-d receiving period. Calves were fed at 0700 h once daily at 1.8% of bodyweight (dry matter basis) from February 2 to March 13, 2021; thereafter the daily feed allotment was increased to 2.0% of bodyweight. The diet contained (dry matter basis) 39.5% dry-rolled corn, 7.5% supplement, 40% wet corn gluten feed, and 13% prairie hay. Steers were individually weighed on days 29 and 58 and pen weights were measured weekly to determine feed offered for the following week. Body weights on days 29 and 58, dry matter intake, or gain-to-feed ratio during the receiving period did not differ (P ≥ 0.34) between treatments. During the first 29 d, average daily gain (ADG) increased linearly as bunk space increased (P = 0.03); however, no treatment effects were observed thereafter. In addition, ADG standard deviation from days 0 to 29 responded quadratically (P = 0.05) where ADG standard deviation tended to be greater in the 38.1-cm allotment and was greater in the 50.8-cm allotment compared to the 25.4-cm allotment (P = 0.07 and P = 0.04, respectively). Bunk score tended to decrease linearly as bunk allotment decreased (P = 0.06). Following the receiving period, steers were blocked by bunk treatment and randomly assigned to 1 of 18 pastures. Steers were grazed for 90-d from May to August at a targeted stocking density of 280 kg live-weight ˖ ha-1. During the grazing season, ADG increased linearly with reduced (P < 0.01) bunk allotment; however, body weights did not differ (P = 0.91) between bunk treatments at the completion of the grazing period. In addition, overall total body weight gains and ADG from the receiving and grazing periods did not differ (P > 0.57) between bunk treatments. We interpreted our data to suggest that bunk space allotments of 25.4 to 63.5 cm per head had minimal impact on growth performance during a 58-d receiving period and did not affect final body weights following a 90-d grazing season.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Zachary M Duncan, and Zachary L DeBord, and Madison G Pflughoeft, and Kyler J Suhr, and William R Hollenbeck, and Anthony J Tarpoff, and K C Olson, and Dale A Blasi
July 2003, Journal of animal science,
Zachary M Duncan, and Zachary L DeBord, and Madison G Pflughoeft, and Kyler J Suhr, and William R Hollenbeck, and Anthony J Tarpoff, and K C Olson, and Dale A Blasi
December 1997, Journal of animal science,
Zachary M Duncan, and Zachary L DeBord, and Madison G Pflughoeft, and Kyler J Suhr, and William R Hollenbeck, and Anthony J Tarpoff, and K C Olson, and Dale A Blasi
September 2000, Journal of animal science,
Zachary M Duncan, and Zachary L DeBord, and Madison G Pflughoeft, and Kyler J Suhr, and William R Hollenbeck, and Anthony J Tarpoff, and K C Olson, and Dale A Blasi
January 1991, Journal of animal science,
Zachary M Duncan, and Zachary L DeBord, and Madison G Pflughoeft, and Kyler J Suhr, and William R Hollenbeck, and Anthony J Tarpoff, and K C Olson, and Dale A Blasi
June 2021, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI,
Zachary M Duncan, and Zachary L DeBord, and Madison G Pflughoeft, and Kyler J Suhr, and William R Hollenbeck, and Anthony J Tarpoff, and K C Olson, and Dale A Blasi
March 1998, Journal of dairy science,
Zachary M Duncan, and Zachary L DeBord, and Madison G Pflughoeft, and Kyler J Suhr, and William R Hollenbeck, and Anthony J Tarpoff, and K C Olson, and Dale A Blasi
January 1978, World review of nutrition and dietetics,
Zachary M Duncan, and Zachary L DeBord, and Madison G Pflughoeft, and Kyler J Suhr, and William R Hollenbeck, and Anthony J Tarpoff, and K C Olson, and Dale A Blasi
December 1965, The Journal of nutrition,
Zachary M Duncan, and Zachary L DeBord, and Madison G Pflughoeft, and Kyler J Suhr, and William R Hollenbeck, and Anthony J Tarpoff, and K C Olson, and Dale A Blasi
March 1974, Journal of animal science,
Zachary M Duncan, and Zachary L DeBord, and Madison G Pflughoeft, and Kyler J Suhr, and William R Hollenbeck, and Anthony J Tarpoff, and K C Olson, and Dale A Blasi
March 1991, Journal of animal science,
Copied contents to your clipboard!