The usual method of measuring density dependence of maximum expiratory flows is superimposition at total lung capacity or residual volume of maximum expiratory flow volume (MEFV) curves obtained breathing air and a mixture of 80% He plus 20% O2 (HeO2). A major problem with this technique is the large variability in results, which has been thought to be due to errors in matching lung volumes on both gases. Accordingly, we obtained MEFV curves breathing air and HeO2 using a bag-in-the-box system so that the curves breathing the two gas mixtures could be directly superimposed without removing the mouthpiece (isovolume). Ten healthy, nonsmoking subjects performed MEFV curves on each gas mixture for six consecutive experiments. We compared the increase in flow at 50% of vital capacity (delta Vmax50) and volume of isoflow (Viso) by superimposing and matching the MEFV curves at total lung capacity, at residual volume, and using the isovolume method. The variability of each method was assessed by the mean intersubject and intrasubject coefficients of variation. In all subjects, the mean delta Vmax50 and Viso as well as their corresponding coefficients of variation were not significantly different among the three methods. We conclude that, in healthy nonsmoking young adults, the method chosen for superimposing and matching MEFV curves has no effect on the variability of delta Vmax50 and Viso.