OBJECTIVE To evaluate the in-vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam and comparator agents against contemporary Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from US hospitals. METHODS In total, 3184 isolates were collected consecutively from 71 US medical centres in 2020-2021, and susceptibility tested by reference broth microdilution. Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute breakpoints were applied. RESULTS Ceftazidime-avibactam [97.0% susceptible (S)], ceftolozane-tazobactam (98.0%S), imipenem-relebactam (97.3%S) and tobramycin (96.4%S) were the most active agents against the aggregate P. aeruginosa isolate collection, and retained good activity against piperacillin-tazobactam-non-susceptible, meropenem-non-susceptible and multi-drug-resistant (MDR) isolates. All other antimicrobials tested showed limited activity against piperacillin-tazobactam-non-susceptible, meropenem-non-susceptible and MDR isolates. The most common infections were pneumonia (45.9%), skin and skin structure infections (19.0%), urinary tract infections (17.0%) and bloodstream infections (11.7%); ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam and imipenem-relebactam showed consistent activity against isolates from these infection types. Susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem was lower among isolates from pneumonia compared with other infection types. CONCLUSIONS Ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam and imipenem-relebactam were highly active, and exhibited similar coverage against a large contemporary collection of P. aeruginosa isolates from US hospitals. Cross-resistance among the newer β-lactams/β-lactam inhibitors (BL/BLIs) varied markedly; ≥72.1% of isolates resistant to one of the three newer BL/BLIs approved for P. aeruginosa treatment remained susceptible to at least one of the other two BL/BLIs, indicating that all three should be tested in the clinical laboratory. These three BL/BLIs represent valuable therapeutic options for P. aeruginosa infection.