[Comparison of Carbon Emissions in Different Treatment and Disposal Process Routes of Municipal Sludge]. 2023

Zhe-Kun Li, and Li-Qiu Zhang, and Zi-Wen Du, and Li Feng, and Yong-Ze Liu
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.

With the introduction of the goal of carbon neutrality, the efficient resource recycling of municipal sludge has been given increasing attention. In order to scientifically evaluate the routes of sludge treatment and disposal from the perspective of carbon emissions, four typical routes were chosen for accounting the carbon emissions per ton for dry sludge (DS). Based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), combined with Chinese sludge characteristics, carbon emissions were divided into three types:the direct emissions, indirect emissions, and carbon offsets, and accounting boundaries were initiated at sludge thickening and ended at products or energies. The results showed that the total carbon emission of R4 (gravity thickening+thermal hydrolysis+anaerobic digestion+plate and frame filter pressing+transportation+land utilization) was 99.41 kg·t-1(calculated as CO2/DS, same below), which was the route with lowest carbon emissions. If the fugitive emission of CH4 from anaerobic digestion was avoided, the route (R4) could achieve carbon neutrality at this stage. Process units with larger carbon emissions should focus on optimization to reduce the carbon emissions, such as through thermal drying (1049.24 kg·t-1), deep dewatering (960.99 kg·t-1), sanitary landfill (786.24 kg·t-1), incineration (635.52 kg·t-1), aerobic composting (614.17 kg·t-1), and thermal hydrolysis (544.67 kg·t-1). The main carbon offsets were the incineration power generation (-1440.29 kg·t-1), CH4 collection of anaerobic digestion (-435.06 kg·t-1), land utilization (-415.83 kg·t-1), and building materials utilization (-169.75 kg·t-1). In summary, "anaerobic digestion and land utilization" has a great potential for carbon offsets, which should be advocated for as the widely used treatment.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Zhe-Kun Li, and Li-Qiu Zhang, and Zi-Wen Du, and Li Feng, and Yong-Ze Liu
March 2021, Environmental science and pollution research international,
Zhe-Kun Li, and Li-Qiu Zhang, and Zi-Wen Du, and Li Feng, and Yong-Ze Liu
August 2022, Environment international,
Zhe-Kun Li, and Li-Qiu Zhang, and Zi-Wen Du, and Li Feng, and Yong-Ze Liu
October 2019, Data in brief,
Zhe-Kun Li, and Li-Qiu Zhang, and Zi-Wen Du, and Li Feng, and Yong-Ze Liu
May 2024, Environmental technology,
Zhe-Kun Li, and Li-Qiu Zhang, and Zi-Wen Du, and Li Feng, and Yong-Ze Liu
October 2017, Huan jing ke xue= Huanjing kexue,
Zhe-Kun Li, and Li-Qiu Zhang, and Zi-Wen Du, and Li Feng, and Yong-Ze Liu
January 2005, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation,
Zhe-Kun Li, and Li-Qiu Zhang, and Zi-Wen Du, and Li Feng, and Yong-Ze Liu
June 1972, Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation,
Zhe-Kun Li, and Li-Qiu Zhang, and Zi-Wen Du, and Li Feng, and Yong-Ze Liu
June 1970, Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation,
Zhe-Kun Li, and Li-Qiu Zhang, and Zi-Wen Du, and Li Feng, and Yong-Ze Liu
January 2000, Schriftenreihe des Vereins fur Wasser-, Boden- und Lufthygiene,
Zhe-Kun Li, and Li-Qiu Zhang, and Zi-Wen Du, and Li Feng, and Yong-Ze Liu
January 2023, Journal of environmental management,
Copied contents to your clipboard!