In surgical procedures where the risk of accidental nerve damage is prevalent, surgeons commonly use electrical stimulation (ES) during intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) to assess a nerve's functional integrity. ES, however, is subject to off-target stimulation and stimulation artifacts disguising the true functionality of the specific target and complicating interpretation. Lacking a stimulation artifact and having a higher degree of spatial specificity, infrared neural stimulation (INS) has the potential to improve upon clinical ES for IONM. Here, we present a direct comparison between clinical ES and INS for IONM performance in an in vivo rat model. The sensitivity of INS surpasses that of ES in detecting partial forms of damage while maintaining a comparable specificity and sensitivity to more complete forms. Without loss in performance, INS is readily compatible with existing clinical nerve monitoring systems. These findings underscore the clinical potential of INS to improve IONM and surgical outcomes.