Are all primary retinal detachments the same? Anatomic and functional differences between phakic and pseudophakic patients. 2023

Ane Gibelalde, and Sergio Pinar-Sueiro, and Oliver Ibarrondo, and Itziar Martínez-Soroa, and Javier Mendicute, and Miguel Ruiz Miguel
Department of Ophthalmology, Donostia University Hospital, Paseo del Dr Beguiristain sn. San Sebastian, 20014, Donostia San-Sebastian, Gipuzkoa, Spain. anegibelalde@hotmail.com.

BACKGROUND Given differences in the pathogenic mechanisms underlying primary retinal detachment (RD) as a function of the status of the lens, the objective was to explore differences between pseudophakic and phakic patients with primary RD. METHODS A retrospective study including 821 patients who underwent surgery for RD [491 cases of phakic and 330 of pseudophakic RD (pRD and psRD, respectively)] in our hospital between 2012 and 2020. RESULTS The mean age was 58.24 ± 12.76 years in the pRD group and 66.87 ± 11.18 years in the psRD group (p = 0.001). There were more men in both groups (70% and 64.23% of pseudophakic and phakic patients, respectively; p = 0.07). The most common location for the RD was superior in both groups (43.94% and 51.93% of pseudophakic and phakic patients, respectively), rates of inferior and total RD were somewhat higher in the psRD group (31.82% and 13.33% in pseudophakic vs 25.25% and 11.0% in phakic patients, p = 0.001). In pseudophakic and phakic patients respectively, macular involvement in 69.09% and 62.73% of cases (p = 0.067). Proliferative vitreoretinopathy was significantly more common in the psRD group (7.88% vs 3.6% in phakic patients, p = 0.01).The rate of final anatomic reattachment differed markedly between groups, with a higher rate in phakic (94.03%) than pseudophakic (87.27%) patients (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The specific pathogenic mechanism involved in psRD seems to be responsible for worse evolution characteristics which are associated with poorer final anatomic and functional outcomes in pseudophakic patients.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Ane Gibelalde, and Sergio Pinar-Sueiro, and Oliver Ibarrondo, and Itziar Martínez-Soroa, and Javier Mendicute, and Miguel Ruiz Miguel
February 1992, Ophthalmology,
Ane Gibelalde, and Sergio Pinar-Sueiro, and Oliver Ibarrondo, and Itziar Martínez-Soroa, and Javier Mendicute, and Miguel Ruiz Miguel
March 2008, The British journal of ophthalmology,
Ane Gibelalde, and Sergio Pinar-Sueiro, and Oliver Ibarrondo, and Itziar Martínez-Soroa, and Javier Mendicute, and Miguel Ruiz Miguel
September 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery,
Ane Gibelalde, and Sergio Pinar-Sueiro, and Oliver Ibarrondo, and Itziar Martínez-Soroa, and Javier Mendicute, and Miguel Ruiz Miguel
January 1985, Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.),
Ane Gibelalde, and Sergio Pinar-Sueiro, and Oliver Ibarrondo, and Itziar Martínez-Soroa, and Javier Mendicute, and Miguel Ruiz Miguel
February 2021, American journal of ophthalmology,
Ane Gibelalde, and Sergio Pinar-Sueiro, and Oliver Ibarrondo, and Itziar Martínez-Soroa, and Javier Mendicute, and Miguel Ruiz Miguel
October 1999, Eye (London, England),
Ane Gibelalde, and Sergio Pinar-Sueiro, and Oliver Ibarrondo, and Itziar Martínez-Soroa, and Javier Mendicute, and Miguel Ruiz Miguel
January 2013, Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.),
Ane Gibelalde, and Sergio Pinar-Sueiro, and Oliver Ibarrondo, and Itziar Martínez-Soroa, and Javier Mendicute, and Miguel Ruiz Miguel
August 2005, Eye (London, England),
Ane Gibelalde, and Sergio Pinar-Sueiro, and Oliver Ibarrondo, and Itziar Martínez-Soroa, and Javier Mendicute, and Miguel Ruiz Miguel
May 1988, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde,
Ane Gibelalde, and Sergio Pinar-Sueiro, and Oliver Ibarrondo, and Itziar Martínez-Soroa, and Javier Mendicute, and Miguel Ruiz Miguel
January 1995, Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.),
Copied contents to your clipboard!