The effect of digital health interventions on postpartum depression or anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. 2024

Adam K Lewkowitz, and Anna R Whelan, and Nina K Ayala, and Angela Hardi, and Carrie Stoll, and Cynthia L Battle, and Methodius G Tuuli, and Megan L Ranney, and Emily S Miller
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI; Center for Digital Health, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI. Electronic address: lewkowitza@wustl.edu.

This study aimed to examine the effect of digital health interventions compared with treatment as usual on preventing and treating postpartum depression and postpartum anxiety. Searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The systematic review included full-text randomized controlled trials comparing digital health interventions with treatment as usual for preventing or treating postpartum depression and postpartum anxiety. Two authors independently screened all abstracts for eligibility and independently reviewed all potentially eligible full-text articles for inclusion. A third author screened abstracts and full-text articles as needed to determine eligibility in cases of discrepancy. The primary outcome was the score on the first ascertainment of postpartum depression or postpartum anxiety symptoms after the intervention. Secondary outcomes included screening positive for postpartum depression or postpartum anxiety --as defined in the primary study --and loss to follow-up, defined as the proportion of participants who completed the final study assessment compared with the number of initially randomized participants. For continuous outcomes, the Hedges method was used to obtain standardized mean differences when the studies used different psychometric scales, and weighted mean differences were calculated when studies used the same psychometric scales. For categorical outcomes, pooled relative risks were estimated. Of 921 studies originally identified, 31 randomized controlled trials-corresponding to 5532 participants randomized to digital health intervention and 5492 participants randomized to treatment as usual-were included. Compared with treatment as usual, digital health interventions significantly reduced mean scores ascertaining postpartum depression symptoms (29 studies: standardized mean difference, -0.64 [95% confidence interval, -0.88 to -0.40]; I2=94.4%) and postpartum anxiety symptoms (17 studies: standardized mean difference, -0.49 [95% confidence interval, -0.72 to -0.25]; I2=84.6%). In the few studies that assessed screen-positive rates for postpartum depression (n=4) or postpartum anxiety (n=1), there were no significant differences between those randomized to digital health intervention and treatment as usual. Overall, those randomized to digital health intervention had 38% increased risk of not completing the final study assessment compared with those randomized to treatment as usual (pooled relative risk, 1.38 [95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.62]), but those randomized to app-based digital health intervention had similar loss-to-follow-up rates as those randomized to treatment as usual (relative risk, 1.04 [95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.19]). Digital health interventions modestly, but significantly, reduced scores assessing postpartum depression and postpartum anxiety symptoms. More research is needed to identify digital health interventions that effectively prevent or treat postpartum depression and postpartum anxiety but encourage ongoing engagement throughout the study period.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Adam K Lewkowitz, and Anna R Whelan, and Nina K Ayala, and Angela Hardi, and Carrie Stoll, and Cynthia L Battle, and Methodius G Tuuli, and Megan L Ranney, and Emily S Miller
September 2022, Journal of telemedicine and telecare,
Adam K Lewkowitz, and Anna R Whelan, and Nina K Ayala, and Angela Hardi, and Carrie Stoll, and Cynthia L Battle, and Methodius G Tuuli, and Megan L Ranney, and Emily S Miller
June 2023, The American journal of clinical nutrition,
Adam K Lewkowitz, and Anna R Whelan, and Nina K Ayala, and Angela Hardi, and Carrie Stoll, and Cynthia L Battle, and Methodius G Tuuli, and Megan L Ranney, and Emily S Miller
December 2025, The Journal of clinical psychiatry,
Adam K Lewkowitz, and Anna R Whelan, and Nina K Ayala, and Angela Hardi, and Carrie Stoll, and Cynthia L Battle, and Methodius G Tuuli, and Megan L Ranney, and Emily S Miller
July 2025, Journal of reproductive and infant psychology,
Adam K Lewkowitz, and Anna R Whelan, and Nina K Ayala, and Angela Hardi, and Carrie Stoll, and Cynthia L Battle, and Methodius G Tuuli, and Megan L Ranney, and Emily S Miller
January 2019, PeerJ,
Adam K Lewkowitz, and Anna R Whelan, and Nina K Ayala, and Angela Hardi, and Carrie Stoll, and Cynthia L Battle, and Methodius G Tuuli, and Megan L Ranney, and Emily S Miller
September 2022, Journal of medical Internet research,
Adam K Lewkowitz, and Anna R Whelan, and Nina K Ayala, and Angela Hardi, and Carrie Stoll, and Cynthia L Battle, and Methodius G Tuuli, and Megan L Ranney, and Emily S Miller
January 2025, PloS one,
Adam K Lewkowitz, and Anna R Whelan, and Nina K Ayala, and Angela Hardi, and Carrie Stoll, and Cynthia L Battle, and Methodius G Tuuli, and Megan L Ranney, and Emily S Miller
September 2017, Birth (Berkeley, Calif.),
Adam K Lewkowitz, and Anna R Whelan, and Nina K Ayala, and Angela Hardi, and Carrie Stoll, and Cynthia L Battle, and Methodius G Tuuli, and Megan L Ranney, and Emily S Miller
November 2025, Psychological medicine,
Adam K Lewkowitz, and Anna R Whelan, and Nina K Ayala, and Angela Hardi, and Carrie Stoll, and Cynthia L Battle, and Methodius G Tuuli, and Megan L Ranney, and Emily S Miller
February 2024, Aging & mental health,
Copied contents to your clipboard!