Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy is Associated With Decreased Survival in Early-Stage Gastric Cancer. 2024

Julie B Siegel, and Rupak Mukherjee, and Bryce DeChamplain, and Jeffrey M Sutton, and David M Mahvi, and William P Lancaster
Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

BACKGROUND Although randomized controlled trials on neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer have included some T1-staged tumors, overall survival (OS) has not been analyzed for this subset. Due to the low negative predictive value of clinical staging and the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced disease, identifying patient groups with early-stage gastric cancer that may benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy is of merit. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between OS and sequence of surgical therapy for clinical T1 gastric cancer. METHODS The 2017 National Cancer Database was used to compare patients who had surgery-first and those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for T1-stage gastric cancer. OS was analyzed using a parametric regression survival-time model adjusted for covariates. The effects of these covariates on OS based on surgical sequence were examined. RESULTS 11,219 patients were included, of which 10,191 underwent surgery as their first or only treatment. When adjusted for covariates, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by curative-intent surgery was significantly associated with increased risk of death (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-1.31, P = .030). In multivariate analysis, clinical N0 stage, non-minorities, and patients with high socioeconomic status had improved OS if they did not have neoadjuvant chemotherapy and instead had upfront surgery. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with decreased OS for early-stage gastric adenocarcinoma, even for patients with clinically positive nodal disease. In addition, the lack of survival improvement with a surgery-first approach in patients with disparities deserves further study.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Julie B Siegel, and Rupak Mukherjee, and Bryce DeChamplain, and Jeffrey M Sutton, and David M Mahvi, and William P Lancaster
November 2020, Anticancer research,
Julie B Siegel, and Rupak Mukherjee, and Bryce DeChamplain, and Jeffrey M Sutton, and David M Mahvi, and William P Lancaster
May 2011, Oncology reports,
Julie B Siegel, and Rupak Mukherjee, and Bryce DeChamplain, and Jeffrey M Sutton, and David M Mahvi, and William P Lancaster
June 2017, The Lancet. Oncology,
Julie B Siegel, and Rupak Mukherjee, and Bryce DeChamplain, and Jeffrey M Sutton, and David M Mahvi, and William P Lancaster
April 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery,
Julie B Siegel, and Rupak Mukherjee, and Bryce DeChamplain, and Jeffrey M Sutton, and David M Mahvi, and William P Lancaster
May 2023, American journal of surgery,
Julie B Siegel, and Rupak Mukherjee, and Bryce DeChamplain, and Jeffrey M Sutton, and David M Mahvi, and William P Lancaster
December 2021, Journal of surgical oncology,
Julie B Siegel, and Rupak Mukherjee, and Bryce DeChamplain, and Jeffrey M Sutton, and David M Mahvi, and William P Lancaster
January 2020, Translational cancer research,
Julie B Siegel, and Rupak Mukherjee, and Bryce DeChamplain, and Jeffrey M Sutton, and David M Mahvi, and William P Lancaster
January 2023, Oncology research and treatment,
Julie B Siegel, and Rupak Mukherjee, and Bryce DeChamplain, and Jeffrey M Sutton, and David M Mahvi, and William P Lancaster
December 2022, Surgery,
Julie B Siegel, and Rupak Mukherjee, and Bryce DeChamplain, and Jeffrey M Sutton, and David M Mahvi, and William P Lancaster
February 2024, Cancer treatment reviews,
Copied contents to your clipboard!