The present study compares a modified hot-plate test in which the temperature is slowly increased from non-noxious levels with a standard constant temperature hot-plate test. In both tests, hindpaw lick was found to be a more reliable criterion response than forepaw lick, and was employed throughout the experiments. In the constant temperature hot-plate test, 1-min exposure to the test apparatus the day before testing significantly reduced the response latencies of both rats and mice. No effect of pre-exposure was found in the increasing temperature test. In both tests and in both species, sessions of repeated testing were conducted with only insignificant alterations in responsiveness between trials. In both rats and mice, dose-related increases in response temperature were obtained in the increasing temperature hot-plate test after administration of morphine, paracetamol and acetylsalicylic acid, whereas only morphine had consistent effects in the constant temperature test. Thus, the increasing temperature hot-plate is a useful analgesimetric test in both rats and mice, superior to the conventional hot-plate test with regard to consistency of results and sensitivity to non-narcotic analgesics.