-transparent.png){kind=logo}
If the initial evaluation of the urinary tract raises the possibility of renal mass, one must decide what study or studies to perform to confirm or deny its presence. Radionuclide imaging has been the study of choice in this situation. Six cases are presented in which computed tomography definitively demonstrated that a suspicious renal mass represented normal renal parenchyma. Comparison with other renal imaging modalities is discussed.
Related Publications
E L Simpson, and
M C Mintz, and
H M Pollack, and
P H Arger, and
B G Coleman
August 1978,
Gastrointestinal radiology,
E L Simpson, and
M C Mintz, and
H M Pollack, and
P H Arger, and
B G Coleman
April 1982,
Journal of computer assisted tomography,
E L Simpson, and
M C Mintz, and
H M Pollack, and
P H Arger, and
B G Coleman
July 2010,
Radiologic clinics of North America,
E L Simpson, and
M C Mintz, and
H M Pollack, and
P H Arger, and
B G Coleman
May 1982,
American journal of hematology,
E L Simpson, and
M C Mintz, and
H M Pollack, and
P H Arger, and
B G Coleman
March 1978,
Radiology,
E L Simpson, and
M C Mintz, and
H M Pollack, and
P H Arger, and
B G Coleman
December 1980,
Journal of computer assisted tomography,
E L Simpson, and
M C Mintz, and
H M Pollack, and
P H Arger, and
B G Coleman
September 1978,
Radiology,
E L Simpson, and
M C Mintz, and
H M Pollack, and
P H Arger, and
B G Coleman
August 1984,
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai zasshi. Nippon acta radiologica,
E L Simpson, and
M C Mintz, and
H M Pollack, and
P H Arger, and
B G Coleman
January 1991,
Vestnik rentgenologii i radiologii,
E L Simpson, and
M C Mintz, and
H M Pollack, and
P H Arger, and
B G Coleman
May 1984,
Rinsho hoshasen. Clinical radiography,
