Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage versus endoscopic gallbladder stenting for managing acute cholecystitis until laparoscopic cholecystectomy. 2024

Kuniya Tanaka, and Yuichi Takano, and Gaku Kigawa, and Toshimitsu Shiozawa, and Yuki Takahashi, and Masatsugu Nagahama
Department of General and Gastroenterological Surgery, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.

BACKGROUND Gallbladder drainage by methods such as percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) or endoscopic gallbladder stenting (EGBS) is important in the early management of moderate to severe acute cholecystitis. METHODS In patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystitis after a month or more of gallbladder drainage, the clinical course was compared between patients initially treated with PTGBD or EGBS. RESULTS Among 331 patients undergoing LC for cholecystitis between 2018 and 2022, 43 first underwent 1 or more months of gallbladder drainage. The median interval between drainage initiation and LC was 89 days (range, 28-261) among 34 patients with PTGBD and 70 days (range, 62-188) among nine with EGBS (p = 0.644). During this waiting period, PTGBD was clamped in six patients and removed in five. Cholecystitis relapsed in three PTGBD patients (9%) and four EGBS patients (44%; p = 0.026). Relapses were managed with medications. Cholecystectomy duration (p = 0.022), intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.026), frequency of abdominal drain insertion (p = 0.023), and resort to bailout surgery such as fundus-first approaches (p = 0.030) were significantly greater in patients with EGBS. Postoperative complications were somewhat likelier (p = 0.095) and postoperative hospital stays were longer (p = 0.007) in the EGBS group. CONCLUSIONS Among patients whose LC was performed 1 or more months after initiation of drainage, daily living during the waiting period associated with drainage was well supported by EGBS, but LC and the postoperative course were more complicated than in PTGBD patients.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Kuniya Tanaka, and Yuichi Takano, and Gaku Kigawa, and Toshimitsu Shiozawa, and Yuki Takahashi, and Masatsugu Nagahama
January 2021, Scientific reports,
Kuniya Tanaka, and Yuichi Takano, and Gaku Kigawa, and Toshimitsu Shiozawa, and Yuki Takahashi, and Masatsugu Nagahama
November 2021, The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology,
Kuniya Tanaka, and Yuichi Takano, and Gaku Kigawa, and Toshimitsu Shiozawa, and Yuki Takahashi, and Masatsugu Nagahama
March 2015, Surgery today,
Kuniya Tanaka, and Yuichi Takano, and Gaku Kigawa, and Toshimitsu Shiozawa, and Yuki Takahashi, and Masatsugu Nagahama
June 2013, Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai zasshi = The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology,
Kuniya Tanaka, and Yuichi Takano, and Gaku Kigawa, and Toshimitsu Shiozawa, and Yuki Takahashi, and Masatsugu Nagahama
December 2002, Surgical endoscopy,
Kuniya Tanaka, and Yuichi Takano, and Gaku Kigawa, and Toshimitsu Shiozawa, and Yuki Takahashi, and Masatsugu Nagahama
November 2017, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England,
Kuniya Tanaka, and Yuichi Takano, and Gaku Kigawa, and Toshimitsu Shiozawa, and Yuki Takahashi, and Masatsugu Nagahama
June 2004, Gastrointestinal endoscopy,
Kuniya Tanaka, and Yuichi Takano, and Gaku Kigawa, and Toshimitsu Shiozawa, and Yuki Takahashi, and Masatsugu Nagahama
January 2023, Asian journal of surgery,
Kuniya Tanaka, and Yuichi Takano, and Gaku Kigawa, and Toshimitsu Shiozawa, and Yuki Takahashi, and Masatsugu Nagahama
March 2018, The American surgeon,
Kuniya Tanaka, and Yuichi Takano, and Gaku Kigawa, and Toshimitsu Shiozawa, and Yuki Takahashi, and Masatsugu Nagahama
October 2021, BMC surgery,
Copied contents to your clipboard!