Outcomes of Scleral Buckling After Failed Pneumatic Retinopexy. 2024

Tuan Tran, and Henry Chen, and Bonnie He, and David Albiani, and Andrew Kirker, and Andrew Merkur, and David Maberley, and Zaid Mammo
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Purpose: To assess the visual and anatomic outcomes of eyes that had secondary scleral buckle (SB) surgery after unsuccessful pneumatic retinopexy (PR) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Methods: A retrospective study, performed over a 12-year period, comprised patients who had secondary SB procedures after failed primary PR. Clinical parameters (eg, best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], lens status, macula status, details of RRD and subretinal fluid) were assessed at presentation, before additional procedures, and at follow-up (6 months, 1 year, and last visit). Statistical comparisons were made using Brown-Forsythe and Welch analysis-of-variance tests, with significance levels set at P < .05. Results: Fifty-four eyes with adequate follow-up were included. Forty-four (81.5%) of 54 eyes had successful retinal reattachment with secondary SB alone. The remaining eyes had subsequent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Patients presenting with macula-on RRD who had successful secondary SB had no statistically significant change in BCVA from baseline (mean final, 0.23 ± 0.25 logMAR [Snellen 20/34]; P = .999). There was a statistically significant improvement in BCVA in patients presenting with macula-off RRD who had successful secondary SB (mean final, 0.32 ± 0.36 logMAR [20/42]; P < .001 and mean change, -1.06 ± 0.85 logMAR). Ten patients presenting with macula-off RRD who had failed secondary SB had a significant improvement in the final BCVA (mean final, 0.22 ± 0.28 logMAR [20/33]; P = .044), despite the need for an additional PPV to achieve reattachment. Conclusions: Secondary SB remains a good option for RRD repair after unsuccessful PR and may avoid the need for PPV.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Tuan Tran, and Henry Chen, and Bonnie He, and David Albiani, and Andrew Kirker, and Andrew Merkur, and David Maberley, and Zaid Mammo
January 1990, Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960),
Tuan Tran, and Henry Chen, and Bonnie He, and David Albiani, and Andrew Kirker, and Andrew Merkur, and David Maberley, and Zaid Mammo
January 1988, Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960),
Tuan Tran, and Henry Chen, and Bonnie He, and David Albiani, and Andrew Kirker, and Andrew Merkur, and David Maberley, and Zaid Mammo
November 1992, Ophthalmology,
Tuan Tran, and Henry Chen, and Bonnie He, and David Albiani, and Andrew Kirker, and Andrew Merkur, and David Maberley, and Zaid Mammo
May 2008, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft,
Tuan Tran, and Henry Chen, and Bonnie He, and David Albiani, and Andrew Kirker, and Andrew Merkur, and David Maberley, and Zaid Mammo
December 1992, Harefuah,
Tuan Tran, and Henry Chen, and Bonnie He, and David Albiani, and Andrew Kirker, and Andrew Merkur, and David Maberley, and Zaid Mammo
September 2022, European journal of ophthalmology,
Tuan Tran, and Henry Chen, and Bonnie He, and David Albiani, and Andrew Kirker, and Andrew Merkur, and David Maberley, and Zaid Mammo
June 2008, Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft,
Tuan Tran, and Henry Chen, and Bonnie He, and David Albiani, and Andrew Kirker, and Andrew Merkur, and David Maberley, and Zaid Mammo
August 2019, BMJ case reports,
Tuan Tran, and Henry Chen, and Bonnie He, and David Albiani, and Andrew Kirker, and Andrew Merkur, and David Maberley, and Zaid Mammo
March 2024, Scientific reports,
Tuan Tran, and Henry Chen, and Bonnie He, and David Albiani, and Andrew Kirker, and Andrew Merkur, and David Maberley, and Zaid Mammo
June 2007, Eye (London, England),
Copied contents to your clipboard!