Efficacy of a stannous fluoride dentifrice for relieving dentinal hypersensitivity in Chinese population: an 8-week randomized clinical trial. 2024

Rui Li, and Wenjie Yang, and Roberta Grimaldi, and Peter Zeng, and Gary Smith, and Xi Chen
Department of Preventive Dentistry, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, No. 639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, China.

OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of using a 0.454% stannous fluoride-containing dentifrice twice daily in relieving dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) in a Chinese population. METHODS This was a single-centre, randomized, controlled, examiner-blind, three-treatment-arm, parallel-group study in participants with clinically diagnosed DH. Subjects who met inclusion criteria (n = 197) were randomly allocated into 3 groups: test group (n = 66)-using a 0.454% stannous fluoride-containing dentifrice twice daily; positive control group (n = 64)-using a 5.0% calcium sodium phosphosilicate-containing dentifrice twice daily; negative control group (n = 67)-using a 1150 ppm of NaF dentifrice twice daily. Status of DH was assessed at week 4 and week 8 by the same independent examiner. Changes from baseline in Schiff sensitivity score, tactile threshold and Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire (DHEQ) score were analysed using analysis of covariance models. The DHEQ evaluated subject-perceived oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). RESULTS Statistically significant improvements in mean Schiff scores (p < 0.0001 for all products at Weeks 4 and 8), tactile threshold (p < 0.0001 for test and negative control at Weeks 4 and 8: Week 4 p = 0.0040 and Week 8 p < 0.0001 for positive control) and all DHEQ scores (p < 0.01 for all groups) were observed. No statistically significant differences were observed in the adjusted mean between all dentifrices at both timepoints, potentially driven by a placebo effect. Forty-two treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported (n = 32 subjects), with 2 serious AEs (n = 1) in the test group. TEAEs were not considered treatment-related. CONCLUSIONS All groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in Schiff score, tactile threshold and OHRQoL. However, due to a possible placebo effect in the negative control, there were no statistically significant differences between the dentifrices. CONCLUSIONS This study adds to the growing research exploring why the placebo effect is a common phenomenon in DH studies. BACKGROUND ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04950465.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Rui Li, and Wenjie Yang, and Roberta Grimaldi, and Peter Zeng, and Gary Smith, and Xi Chen
September 2010, American journal of dentistry,
Rui Li, and Wenjie Yang, and Roberta Grimaldi, and Peter Zeng, and Gary Smith, and Xi Chen
November 2020, Clinical oral investigations,
Rui Li, and Wenjie Yang, and Roberta Grimaldi, and Peter Zeng, and Gary Smith, and Xi Chen
January 2010, The journal of contemporary dental practice,
Rui Li, and Wenjie Yang, and Roberta Grimaldi, and Peter Zeng, and Gary Smith, and Xi Chen
May 2006, The journal of contemporary dental practice,
Rui Li, and Wenjie Yang, and Roberta Grimaldi, and Peter Zeng, and Gary Smith, and Xi Chen
December 2013, Australian dental journal,
Rui Li, and Wenjie Yang, and Roberta Grimaldi, and Peter Zeng, and Gary Smith, and Xi Chen
March 2020, BMC oral health,
Rui Li, and Wenjie Yang, and Roberta Grimaldi, and Peter Zeng, and Gary Smith, and Xi Chen
June 2019, American journal of dentistry,
Rui Li, and Wenjie Yang, and Roberta Grimaldi, and Peter Zeng, and Gary Smith, and Xi Chen
January 2012, The Journal of clinical dentistry,
Rui Li, and Wenjie Yang, and Roberta Grimaldi, and Peter Zeng, and Gary Smith, and Xi Chen
August 2019, International journal of dental hygiene,
Copied contents to your clipboard!