During the past 4 years we have performed 239 reversed vein bypasses for leg ischemia in 196 patients including 45 to the above-knee popliteal artery, 118 to the below-knee popliteal artery, and 76 to infrapopliteal arteries. The cumulative primary patency results by the life-table method through 24 months are 97% at 6 months, 91% at 1 year, and 88% at 2 years. No difference was evident in patency rates with respect to site of distal anastomosis or reason for graft performance (i.e., for claudication [31%] or for limb salvage [69%]). Twenty-two percent of these patients did not have an intact ipsilateral greater saphenous vein. By a variety of techniques including the use of cephalic and lesser saphenous veins, vein splicing, and proximal superficial femoral endarterectomy, we have been able to perform autogenous vein bypass in 94% of all patients who require lower extremity revascularization. The patency of bypasses made from conduits other than greater saphenous vein does not differ from that of the entire series. Both the graft patency and vein utilization rates in the present report are equal to those of recently published series of in situ saphenous vein bypasses and are clearly better than the published results with reversed vein bypass a decade and more ago. We conclude that, although in situ saphenous vein bypass is a good procedure, it is not superior to reversed vein bypass performed in the same time period. This report again emphasizes the hazards of evaluating any new treatment by use of historic controls.